A basic velocity/distance traveled problem (need work checked)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Whitishcube
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
A car accelerates uniformly from rest to a velocity of 100 km/hr in 10 seconds, leading to a calculated distance of approximately 138.89 meters. The final velocity was converted to meters per second, resulting in a slope of 25/9 m/sec. The distance was determined using calculus, integrating the velocity equation over the time interval. The average velocity was found to be 13.89 m/sec by dividing the total distance by the time. The discussion highlights differing preferences for solving the problem, with some favoring calculus and others using equations of motion.
Whitishcube
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A car starts from rest and reaches a velocity of 100 km/hr after accelerating uniformly for 10 seconds. how far has the car gone? what is its average velocity?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


so since this car accelerates uniformly, i assume that it means it has a constant acceleration, meaning the velocity is a linear equation. converting the final velocity to m/sec, i got 250/9 m/sec.

the slope of this line is then 25/9 (using equation for slope, (y_2-y_1)/(x_2-x_1), plugging in values of 250/9 for final velocity and 0 for initial, 10 for final time and 0 for initial).

then the equation for velocity is then (25/9)t.
so,
distance=integral of (25/9)t from t=0 to t=10, yielding an answer of 1250/9 meters, or about 138.89 meters.

for the second part, i just divide this integral by the difference of the two endpoints of the interval; namely 10 and 0.

avg value = integral of (25/9)t from 0 to 10, divided by 10.
this gives me the average velocity, 13.89 m/sec.

am I on the right track here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good to me.
 
EDIT: already checked, never mind. I personally find the equations of motion simpler for a situation such as this, but if that's how feel more comfortable go for it.

My answers agree with yours and so I'd say it looks good.
 
this is true, jarednjames, but i find it a lot simpler to use calculus... just my mindset at least. :P

thanks for the responses!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top