A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME, question

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mchammer9111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    History Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the explanation of why all bodies fall at the same rate regardless of their mass, as presented in Stephen Hawking's "A Brief History of Time." Participants explore the implications of gravitational force, mass, and acceleration in a vacuum, addressing both theoretical and conceptual aspects of the topic.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about why heavier objects do not fall faster than lighter ones, questioning the relationship between mass and gravitational pull.
  • Another participant explains that according to Newton's laws, the acceleration due to gravity is independent of mass, as shown by the cancellation of mass in the equations governing gravitational force.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that while heavier objects do exert a stronger gravitational pull on the Earth, this effect is negligible and does not affect the rate of fall significantly.
  • One participant introduces the concept of inertia, arguing that heavier objects experience a greater force but also have greater mass, leading to the same acceleration for all objects in free fall.
  • Another participant notes that if the motion of the Earth is considered, a heavier person might reach the ground slightly earlier due to the Earth's movement, but emphasizes that this does not imply a faster fall rate.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the principle that all objects fall at the same rate in a vacuum, but there are differing interpretations and explanations regarding the underlying reasons and implications of this phenomenon.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about the negligible effects of human mass on the Earth's movement and the implications of inertia, which may not be fully resolved or universally accepted among participants.

mchammer9111
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I just started reading A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME and I am having a problem understanding Stephen Hawking explanation of why all bodies fall at the same rate. If I weigh twice as much as someone else and we both jump off a cliff at the same time I would tend to think that I would fall faster because I have twice the mass. I pull on the Earth more than he does and it pulls on me more. I know that the rate at which things fall is constant in a vacuum I just don't understand why.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nobody knows why the laws of physics are what they are, we only know what they are. And the laws are:

Newton's 2nd law:
F = MA

Gravity:
Fg = g m1 m2 / r^2

Let m1 be the mass of the Earth, then consider two objects X and Y with different masses mx and my. Now plug into find the acceleration of the X object:

g m1 mx / r^2 = mx ax
g m1 /r^2 = ax

Now you see the mass mx cancels out, so the acceleration of the object (ax) depends only on the mass of the planet it's falling towards and the distance. Thus ax = ay and both objects fall at the same rate regardless of how heavy they are.
 
Your pull on the Earth is extremely negligible. If you (mass of 150 kg) and a friend (mass of 75 kg) both jumped off a cliff at different times, but someone else (presumably because you and your friend would be dead) timed how long it takes to reach the ground, you would reach the ground first by perhaps a billionth of a second faster (I actually just made that number up, but it would nonetheless be a very small number that is almost 0, like .000000001 s). You will have a very very slightly stronger pull than your friend does on the Earth, which will make the distance you fall very slightly smaller.

However, I don't think that is what you meant when you started including forces. I haven't read A Brief History of Time, but I don't think you need to include forces in this discussion. The force your body has on the Earth is insignificant. What we are concerned about is acceleration, and what has been proved is that acceleration in vacuums is not related to mass. So whether you are 20 kg or 400 kg, you will fall at the same rate. Why is this? Well that is like asking questions like why are we here? (which, by the way, isn't an entirely unreasonable question, but I hope you get my point)

EDIT: Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. My physics is a bit rusty.
 
Last edited:
mchammer9111:

Let me try to explain this as simple as possible...

Indeed the Earth pulls heavier objects more (otherwise they wouldn't be called heavy in the first place!)

However, even though the pull is more, don't forget that the mass is also more. So by the law of inertia, that things that are heavier tend to translate a smaller distance than lighter objects for the same pull, the result is that objects fall at the same rate to Earth, no matter their masses.

Alternatively, you can think of the big guy as made up of many small masses. So if the small guy falls at a certain rate, the smaller masses in the big guy will fall at that same rate*! Therefore, the big guy and the small guy falls the same rate.

*The shape of the big guy doesn't change for the same reason.

That is true, neglecting the movement of the Earth due to the big guy or the small guy. If you start to consider that the Earth moves as well, then indeed the big guy will reach the Earth first (since the Earth is going to move faster towards the big guy compared to a smaller guy). But reaching the Earth first does not mean that the big guy moves faster. Furthermore the motion of the Earth is very small if it arises from the pull of any normal human being, as mentioned by the poster above.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K