Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A causal system? the biggest contradiction!

  1. Dec 30, 2006 #1
    a causal system?? the biggest contradiction!

    Hey guys - can someone tell me why i get two contradicting asnwers...

    i am asked to determine whether the following system is causal or not:

    y[k+1] + 0.64y[k-1] = x[k] + 2x[k-1]
    method 1:
    put k = k-1 (delay the signal by one unit)
    therefore , y[k] = -0.64y[k-2] +x[k-1] +2x[k-2]

    it is cleary that this signal is casual because a present ouptut value is dependent on present and past input/output values.

    method 2:
    put k = k+1
    therefore, 0.64y[k] = y[k+2] +x[k+1] +2x[k]

    now the system is clearly not causal!!!! whys is this happening!!

    i can't see any error in my maths. Also , shifting should not alter the signal characteristics!!!

    please someone help!!!

    calculating a tranfer function clearly shows the system IS causal-----so what is up with metho 2?????????/

  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 30, 2006 #2


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I think the confusion is coming about because you have not clearly defined what the "output" of the system is. If it is y[k], which is traditional notation, then your system is non-causal because it relies on a future value y[k+1]. If you are going to define the output of the system as y[k+1], which AFAIK is not traditional notation, then yes, the system would be causal.

    Is the output of the system clearly defined for you?
  4. Dec 30, 2006 #3


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Er, isn't y[k] totally indepentent from y[k+1]?

    Admittedly I don't know the definitions, but I would have assumed that "causal" means "y[k] can be computed without using any future values of x or y". In this case, finding an expression for y[k] involving future values of x and y doesn't invalidate the fact that you can compute y[k] without doing so.
  5. Dec 30, 2006 #4


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Yeah, this is confusing me. Since y[k] is not part of the equation of the "system", I"m not sure how to interpret the equation.

    LM741 -- What is considered the "output" of the system described by that equation?
  6. Dec 30, 2006 #5
    the output of thie system is y[k].

    Berkmen, with no disrespect, i fully disaggree with you.
    You just can't have a sytem that is causal AND non causal. y[k+1] is merely the output in advance by one unit. Also, if you shift the entire system by the sam time unit - nothing has changed - thiss just allows you to view it from a different point of view...
    I just can't seem to get around this 'strange' predicament....

  7. Dec 30, 2006 #6

    D H

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    There's no predicament.

    Consider a simple smoothing IIR filter,
    y[k] = 0.5*x[k] + 0.5*y[k-1].
    This is clearly causal; the output depends only on past and current input and past output. Yet you can rewrite this as
    y[k] = 2*y[k+1] - x[k-1]
    and the filter appears to be acausal. It is not. Bottom line: You just have to be careful with feedback terms.
  8. Dec 30, 2006 #7


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    No disrespect felt on my part at all, LM741. You should have seen my lame reply to Hurkyl's post before I deleted it and tried again. I misread the original equation my first couple times through.

    But help me out here. The original equation does not contain a y[k] term, and you say what I thought, that y[k] is the output of the digital filter. So are you supposed to re-arrange the original equation with substitution like you did to make a y[k]? If so, then the system is causal as D H says. I'm just not used to being given a filter equation that does not specify the y[k] directly in terms of past (and possibly future) values of the input and output.

    Guess I should pull out my old DSP book for a quick refresher, eh? :blushing:
  9. Dec 31, 2006 #8
    My trusty DSP book has the following:
    A linear shift-invariant system is causal if and only if the unit-impulse response h[n] = 0 for n < 0.

    In your case, work out the h[n] of the given difference equation and check if the above condition holds.

    Btw, the definition of causal systems which appears in Wikipedia reads:
    A causal system is a system where the output y(t) at some specific instant t0 only depends on the input x(t) for values of t less than or equal to t0. Therefore these kinds of systems have outputs and internal states that depends only on the current and previous input values. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causal_system" [Broken]

    The definition applies only to "input x(t) for values of t less than or equal to t0" and not so much for the output terms which appear in the difference equation. Thus saying:
    is incorrect.
    Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2017
  10. Dec 31, 2006 #9
    D H - you say the system APPEARS to be non causal - but it is not??????
    that's obviously the problem i'm having - this is a predicament!!
    y[k] = 2*y[k+1] - x[k-1] - how can you tell me this a causal system???

    the current output is dependent on a future output value???? - you see, this is really wired because it seems like we change the casuality property of the system by shifting it.....
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Threads - causal system biggest Date
Does a causal system have to be non-recursive? Mar 13, 2014
Impulse Response of Causal Systems Jan 26, 2013
Causal signals and causal system Jan 21, 2013
Causal Systems Oct 26, 2011
Determining Causal Systems Sep 17, 2011