A classical mechanics problem involve rotating

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a classical mechanics problem involving rotational dynamics, specifically focusing on the relationship between radial distance and angular motion. The user expresses uncertainty about deriving the relationship y/x and suggests that the motion may resemble a helix, with x(t) potentially being exponential. They mention the influence of Coriolis and centrifugal forces on the radial distance r(t). The conversation emphasizes the importance of using appropriate variables and derivatives to analyze the problem effectively. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of modeling rotational motion in classical mechanics.
drop_out_kid
Messages
34
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
I intuitively think this is a helix, x(t) probably a exponential solved by ODE, but I cannot come up with it.. I think in this problem. Coriolis force is for tangential acceleration(r(t) increases) and the centrifugal force is making r(t) increases.
Relevant Equations
F_cor=2mv $Omega$
F_cf=$Omega^2$m*r
1650171676464.png


I came up with these: (especially not sure if second is right)
1650171975775.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From eqs 1 I can get r is exponential, question is to get y/x or other relation from eqs 2
 
drop_out_kid said:
Homework Statement:: I intuitively think this is a helix, x(t) probably a exponential solved by ODE, but I cannot come up with it.. I think in this problem. Coriolis force is for tangential acceleration(r(t) increases) and the centrifugal force is making r(t) increases.
Relevant Equations:: F_cor=2mv $Omega$
F_cf=$Omega^2$m*r

View attachment 300109

I came up with these: (especially not sure if second is right)
View attachment 300110
The instructions are to use x as the radial distance, etc. Turning those into r, phi and using x, y for fixed axes is not going to help.
Start by considering first derivatives, like ##\dot y##.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top