A classical mechanics problem involve rotating

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a classical mechanics problem involving rotational dynamics, specifically focusing on the relationship between radial distance and angular motion. The user expresses uncertainty about deriving the relationship y/x and suggests that the motion may resemble a helix, with x(t) potentially being exponential. They mention the influence of Coriolis and centrifugal forces on the radial distance r(t). The conversation emphasizes the importance of using appropriate variables and derivatives to analyze the problem effectively. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of modeling rotational motion in classical mechanics.
drop_out_kid
Messages
34
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
I intuitively think this is a helix, x(t) probably a exponential solved by ODE, but I cannot come up with it.. I think in this problem. Coriolis force is for tangential acceleration(r(t) increases) and the centrifugal force is making r(t) increases.
Relevant Equations
F_cor=2mv $Omega$
F_cf=$Omega^2$m*r
1650171676464.png


I came up with these: (especially not sure if second is right)
1650171975775.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From eqs 1 I can get r is exponential, question is to get y/x or other relation from eqs 2
 
drop_out_kid said:
Homework Statement:: I intuitively think this is a helix, x(t) probably a exponential solved by ODE, but I cannot come up with it.. I think in this problem. Coriolis force is for tangential acceleration(r(t) increases) and the centrifugal force is making r(t) increases.
Relevant Equations:: F_cor=2mv $Omega$
F_cf=$Omega^2$m*r

View attachment 300109

I came up with these: (especially not sure if second is right)
View attachment 300110
The instructions are to use x as the radial distance, etc. Turning those into r, phi and using x, y for fixed axes is not going to help.
Start by considering first derivatives, like ##\dot y##.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
747
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K