MHB A complex numbers' modulus identity.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the identity involving the modulus of complex numbers, specifically that |z_1| + |z_2| equals the sum of two expressions involving the average of z_1 and z_2 and the square root of their product. The approach suggested involves squaring both sides of the identity to simplify the proof, leveraging the non-negativity of the terms. A connection to the algebraic identity a^2 + 2ab + b^2 is noted, where a and b are the square roots of z_1 and z_2, respectively. The discussion highlights the potential complexity of the proof and seeks a more efficient method to demonstrate the identity. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the need for a clever shortcut in the proof process.
Alone
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
I am searching for a shortcut in the calculation of a proof.

The question is as follows:

2.12 Prove that:

$$|z_1|+|z_2| = |\frac{z_1+z_2}{2}-u|+|\frac{z_1+z_2}{2}+u|$$

where $z_1,z_2$ are two complex numbers and $u=\sqrt{z_1z_2}$.

I thought of showing that the squares of both sides of the above identity are equal, in which case since both sides of the above identity are nonnegative we will get the above identity.

The problem that it seems too tedious work, unless there's some trick to be used here?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have [math]\left|\frac{z_1+ z_2}{2}- \sqrt{z_1z_2}\right|= \left|\frac{z_1- 2\sqrt{z_1z_2}+ z_2}{2}\right|[/math].

Noting the resemblance to [math]a^2+ 2ab+ b^2[/math] I would let [math]a= \sqrt{z_1}[/math] and [math]b= \sqrt{z_2}[/math]. Then [math]\left|\frac{z_1- 2\sqrt{z_1z_2}+ z_2}{2}\right|= \frac{(a- b)^2}{2}[/math]. Do the same thing for [math]\left|\frac{z_1+ z_2}{2}+ \sqrt{z_1z_2}\right|= \left|\frac{z_1+ 2\sqrt{z_1z_2}+ z_2}{2}\right|[/math]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top