A Curious Question about LCD Display

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Akshay_Anti
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curious Lcd
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of chromatic aberration observed on LCD screens when a hair strand clings to the surface. Participants explore whether this effect is due to diffraction, interference, or the arrangement of pixels in the display. The conversation includes technical explanations and personal observations related to the behavior of liquid crystals and pixel arrangements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that a hair strand on an LCD screen causes a region to show chromatic aberration and asks if this is due to diffraction or interference.
  • Another participant mentions that mechanical pressure from fingers while removing hair can induce a "rainbow" effect, suggesting it may distort the crystal matrix.
  • It is proposed that the hair may block certain pixels, leading to color fringing, with specific mention of how blocking a green pixel could result in a magenta fringe.
  • A participant clarifies the difference between additive and subtractive color mixing, explaining how magenta appears when green is blocked.
  • Another viewpoint suggests that the observed effect is not specific to LCDs but rather due to the arrangement of pixels, where the hair edge partially blocks certain subpixels.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various hypotheses regarding the cause of the chromatic aberration, with no consensus reached on whether it is primarily due to diffraction, interference, or pixel arrangement. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the mechanics of liquid crystal displays and the behavior of pixels, but there are unresolved assumptions about the specific interactions between hair strands and the display technology.

Akshay_Anti
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have observed that if by chance a hair strand manages to cling to LCD Screen like TV or laptop screen, a small region near the hairline shows chromatic abberation. Is it due to some diffraction or Interference? Please explain..

Thanks in advance
 
Science news on Phys.org
Would that happen to be noticeable only when you remove the hair? Since Lucy sheds so much, my screen is constantly plastered with cat hair. It doesn't cause any distortion. Mechanical pressure from my fingers, however, while removing that hair does induce a sort of "rainbow" effect. I always figured that it was just a matter of distorting the crystal matrix, but I'm not sure. I try to avoid it for fear of damaging the display.
 
Danger said:
Mechanical pressure from my fingers, however, while removing that hair does induce a sort of "rainbow" effect. I always figured that it was just a matter of distorting the crystal matrix, but I'm not sure. I try to avoid it for fear of damaging the display.

The material in a liquid crystal display is (doh!) a liquid. If you distort the display to make it flow, the liquid carries the "image" with it for a short time.

It's easier to see what is happening with a simple calculator that has a 7-segment type of LCD display, rather than a display with small dots. And if you break a $5 calculator, you haven't lost much.

I don't know about the OP's question. Maybe the hair is about the same width as the individual dots on the display, so it is selectively covering up the red green and blue dots forming the image?
 
AlephZero said:
The material in a liquid crystal display is (doh!) a liquid. If you distort the display to make it flow, the liquid carries the "image" with it for a short time.

True that. The LCD screen is made up of pixels and contains fluid crystal matrix filled in it. Application of mechanical pressure to the screen tends to displace the pixels from that area and also causes color providing matrix to drift away. Press it too hard or for long time and then you'll find that that portion is locally damaged. But that doesn't answer my question exactly.
 
Last edited:
AlephZero said:
The material in a liquid crystal display is (doh!) a liquid.

No ****?! I never would have guessed.
I meant that I'm worried about damaging the addressing components, not the liquid.
 
The pixels can be quite small, so you can get a hair significantly blocking some pixels. Each pixel is either red, green or blue. Blocking a green pixel will result in a magenta 'fringe' at the side of the hair. Often, depending on orientation, you will see a cycling of colour 'fringing' along the length of the hair.
 
pumila said:
The pixels can be quite small, so you can get a hair significantly blocking some pixels. Each pixel is either red, green or blue. Blocking a green pixel will result in a magenta 'fringe' at the side of the hair. Often, depending on orientation, you will see a cycling of colour 'fringing' along the length of the hair.

That could be possible. But one question- suppose the green pixel is blocked, why would I see magenta color, shouldn't i see a mix of red and blue- purple?
 
Magenta is mix of blue and red light; add green and you get white. Purple is mix of blue and red pigments; add yellow and you get a muddy dark colour. First is additive colours, second is pigment (subtractive) colours. Red green and blue are additive primary colours, red yellow and blue are subtractive primary colours.
 
I suspect (as mentioned above) that it's not a diffraction, interference, or LCD-specific effect, but rather simply due to the arrangement of pixels on a modern color display. The hair edge is probably only partially blocking some pixels, causing visible color fringing. The easiest way to visualize this is probably by imagining a pure white screen. If you look closely, it'll be made up of red, green, and blue subpixels. If the edge of the hair is blocking the red and green subpixel, but the blue is left uncovered, you'll get a blue fringe around the object. This can even be seen with something as simple as a piece of paper - the blocking object doesn't need to be small, it merely needs to have a fairly sharp edge (so as to be able to block individual subpixels).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 89 ·
3
Replies
89
Views
8K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K