What is the number of elements in the set {x^(13n) : n is a positive integer}?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yxgao
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cyclic Group
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the number of elements in the set {x^(13n) : n is a positive integer} for an element x in a cyclic group of order 15. It is established that this set contains exactly three elements, based on the condition that the set {x^3, x^5, x^9} has two distinct elements, implying x has an order of 3. The reasoning involves the theorem that states the order of x^k is given by n/gcd(n, k), which leads to |x^(13)| being equal to 3. Examples from the group Z_{15} illustrate that elements like 5 and 10 can have order 3, confirming the findings. The conclusion is that the set {x^(13n)} indeed contains three elements.
yxgao
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
A cyclic group of order 15 has an element x such that the set {x^3, x^5, x^9} has exactly two elements. The number of elements in the set {x^(13n) : n is a positive integer} is :
3.

WHy is the answer 3? Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let x be an element of a cyclic group of order 15. If \{x^3,x^5,x^9\} has exactly 2 elements, then one element must be the same as another. If |x|=3 then x^3=x^9. If |x|=3 then |x^{13}|=3/gcd(3,13)}=3. Hence |<x^{13}>|=3.

Doug
 
Thanks so much for the explanation! However I haven't actually studied group theory before so there's some things I still am not sure about. Why did you assume |x| = 3? What formula did |x^{13}|=3/gcd(3,13)}=3 come from?
Can you give an example of a set that meets this condition?
Thanks!
 
Originally posted by yxgao
Thanks so much for the explanation! However I haven't actually studied group theory before so there's some things I still am not sure about. Why did you assume |x| = 3? What formula did |x^{13}|=3/gcd(3,13)}=3 come from? Can you give an example of a set that meets this condition?
Thanks!

Your original post stated that there exists an element \inline{x} such that \inline{\{x^3,x^5,x^9\}} has exactly two elements. Thus I need to find two elements that are the same. There is a theorem that states if \inline{|x|=n} then \inline{x^i=x^j} if and only if \inline{n} divides \inline{i-j}. If \inline{x^3=x^5} then \inline{|x|=2} which is not possible in a cyclic group of order 15 because 2 does not divide 15. Likewise, \inline{x^5{\neq}x^9}. However if \inline{|x|=3} then \inline{x^3=x^9} because 3 divides \inline{i-j=9-3=6}. Also, a cyclic group of order 15 can have an element with order 3.

There is a theorem that states if \inline{|x|=n} then \inline{|x^k|=n/gcd(n,k)}.

The group \inline{Z_{15}} is the group of integers modulo 15 under addition. Both the element 5 and the element 10 have order 3.

Doug
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top