A Dot product analysis proof (might be simple)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the distance from a point to a line in a Cartesian coordinate system, specifically using the equation of a line in the form ax + by + c = 0 and a point A(α, β). The participants are exploring the geometric interpretation and mathematical formulation of this problem.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to express the distance in terms of vectors and exploring the relationship between the point and the line. Questions arise regarding the definitions of certain variables (H, h, l) and the applicability of the cross-product. Some suggest transforming the line equation for simplification, while others discuss the geometric properties of the distance measurement.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different methods to approach the problem, with some participants providing insights into the geometric definition of distance and the necessity of perpendicularity. However, there is no explicit consensus on a single method or solution yet.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention constraints related to their coursework, indicating that certain theories or methods may not have been covered in their studies, which influences their approach to the problem.

Andrax
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


so we have a (D) Line (geometry) it's Cartesian equation is ax+by+c=0
we have an [itex]A[/itex]([itex]\alpha[/itex],[itex]\beta[/itex])
prove that the distance between the line(D) and the point A is
d=[itex]\frac{la\alpha+b\beta+cl}{\sqrt{a^2+b^2}}[/itex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


let every distance be a vector (sorry didn't find vectors in the latex reference)
AH h belongs to (D) and AH factors (D) so AH(a,b)
we also have n vector (-b,a)
we can say that the catersian equation of ah is -b(x-[itex]\alpha[/itex])+a(y-[itex]\beta[/itex])+c I am pretty musch stuck here now to get this \sqrt{a^2+b^2} we will probably use cos but ireally can't find how r we supposed to use it :( please help guys:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are H and h? What is l?
Do you know the cross-product?
Alternatively, can you transform your line to get ##\sqrt{a^2+b^2}=1##? This is always possible (as a!=0 or b!=0 for a meaningful line).
 
The distance from a point to a line is, by definition, measured along a line through the given point perpendicular to the given line.

We can write ax+ by= c as y= -(a/b)x+ c/b showing that the line has slope -(a/b). A line perpendicular to it must have slope b/a. A line with that slope and passing through the point [itex](\alpha, \beta)[/itex] has equation [itex]y= (b/a)(x- \alpha)+ \beta[/itex] or [itex]bx- ay= b\alpha- a\beta[/itex]. Determine where the two lines intersect, by solving ax+ by= c and [itex]bx- ay= b\alpha- a\beta[/itex] simultaneously and then determine the distance between that point of intersection and [itex](\alpha, \beta)[/itex].

That should get the formula you want.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The distance from a point to a line is, by definition, measured along a line through the given point perpendicular to the given line.

We can write ax+ by= c as y= -(a/b)x+ c/b showing that the line has slope -(a/b). A line perpendicular to it must have slope b/a. A line with that slope and passing through the point [itex](\alpha, \beta)[/itex] has equation [itex]y= (b/a)(x- \alpha)+ \beta[/itex] or [itex]bx- ay= b\alpha- a\beta[/itex]. Determine where the two lines intersect, by solving ax+ by= c and [itex]bx- ay= b\alpha- a\beta[/itex] simultaneously and then determine the distance between that point of intersection and [itex](\alpha, \beta)[/itex].

That should get the formula you want.

thank you.
 
mfb said:
What are H and h? What is l?
Do you know the cross-product?
Alternatively, can you transform your line to get ##\sqrt{a^2+b^2}=1##? This is always possible (as a!=0 or b!=0 for a meaningful line).

thank you but i we didn't study that "theory" so i don't think I'm allowed to apply it anyway the hallsofivy provided a rather simple solution .
 
Andrax said:
thank you but i we didn't study that "theory" so i don't think I'm allowed to apply it anyway the hallsofivy provided a rather simple solution .

Strictly speaking, the distance between a line and a point is defined to be the *shortest* distance between the given point and points on the line. It follows (basically, as a theorem) that the shortest line is perpendicular to the given line, as HallsOfIvy has stated.
 
Ray Vickson said:
Strictly speaking, the distance between a line and a point is defined to be the *shortest* distance between the given point and points on the line. It follows (basically, as a theorem) that the shortest line is perpendicular to the given line, as HallsOfIvy has stated.
In fact, it follows from the Pythagorean theorem. If we measure from point P to line l along a NON perpendicular line, we can drop a perpendicular from P to l giving us a right triangle in which the original, non-perpendicular, distance is the hypotenuse. By [itex]c^2= a^2+ b^2[/itex], c, the length of the hypotenuse is longer than the length of either leg.

Conversely, you can define the "distance between point P and line l" to be measured along the perpendicular and use that theorem to show that it is the shortest distance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K