B A doubt on Thomson's Experiments to determine the value of e / m_e

Rishabh Narula
Messages
61
Reaction score
5
By carrying out accurate measurements
on the amount of deflections observed
by the electrons on the
electric field strength or
magnetic field strength,
Thomson was able to determine
the value of e/me as...
e/me = 1.75 10^11 C kg^-1

would this be a correct understanding of this para-
"This para
is just saying that he made measurements
on how much deflection is being caused by
particular electric and magnetic field strengths
and deduced the ratio from those"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Why don't you provide a reference when you quote litterally, so that a helper can look at the context ?
Saves everybody time and avoids communication errors !
Even if it says copyright NCERT or something (you link, you don't copy).

The context is more didactical than historic, but I see no discrepancies with your version.
Your 'and deduced the ratio' refers to e/m but can easily be mistaken for |E|/|B| by a reader

But your title mentions doubt. About what, specifically ?
 
  • Like
Likes Rishabh Narula
Rishabh Narula said:
"This para
is just saying that he made measurements
on how much deflection is being caused by
particular electric and magnetic field strengths
and deduced the ratio from those"
Remember that the observed ratio of field strengths was for a particular electron velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes Rishabh Narula
BvU said:
Hi,

Why don't you provide a reference when you quote litterally, so that a helper can look at the context ?
Saves everybody time and avoids communication errors !
Even if it says copyright NCERT or something (you link, you don't copy).

The context is more didactical than historic, but I see no discrepancies with your version.
Your 'and deduced the ratio' refers to e/m but can easily be mistaken for |E|/|B| by a reader

But your title mentions doubt. About what, specifically ?
sorry i mean a question
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top