Numbered for reference: 1. The equivalence principle tells us that the crew of a rocket, traveling in flat spacetime and where the crew feels a constant acceleration, experiences a uniform gravitational field identical to that experienced locally by an observer on a planet. 2. Special relativity http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/rocket.html [Broken] that in principle the crew can traverse between any two points A and B in flat spacetime in an arbitrarily short proper time, where the two points are at rest with respect to each other and the rocket accelerates from rest at point A to the halfway point and then decelerates from the halfway point to rest at point B. 3. Then the crew can observe free-rising objects (such as an object floating stationary at the halfway point) to recede apparently arbitrarily fast—a million c is not out of the question—while causal contact is maintained since the actual velocity is always less than c. Example: Let the rocket travel from Earth to Andromeda, two million light years away as we measure. (Assume that Earth and Andromeda are at rest with respect to each other and the spacetime between them is flat.) Let a buoy float stationary at the halfway point. Let the half of the trip from the buoy take ten proper years as the crew measures. Then during this half the buoy recedes by one million proper light years in ten proper years, an apparent (not actual) velocity of one hundred thousand c. From the crew's perspective the buoy free-rises in a uniform gravitational field. 4. Then why does general relativity not predict the same possible observation for the observer on the planet?