What are the properties of a Hermitian Hamiltonian operator?

  • Thread starter Bunting
  • Start date
In summary: Thanks for clarifying! :)In summary, the question asks for a proof that if a hermitian operator, \hat{O}, is defined, then the product of \hat{O} and \hat{O}\dagger is also hermitian. The answer is that \hat{O} and \hat{O}\dagger are hermitian if and only if \hat{O}\hat{O}^{\dagger} is hermitian.
  • #1
Bunting
85
0
So I am working up to some exams and have a question regarding properties of hermitians, specifically the properties of Hamiltonian operators and trying to prove that for example if..

[tex]\hat{O}[/tex] is a hamiltonian operator then...

[tex]\hat{O}[/tex] + [tex]\hat{O}[/tex][tex]\dagger[/tex]

is hermitian*.

Now what I think I am having a problem with is understanding exactly what I am expected to know with regard to this, as what I know about hamiltonian operators (real eigenvalues and orthogonality) don't seem to help a massive amount here (unless I am meant to show that [tex]\hat{O}[/tex] with [tex]\hat{O}[/tex][tex]\dagger[/tex] is orthogonal).

Any help is appreciated, I feel this is one of them subjects where if I start to understand with one example like this I will be able to nail the rest out pretty quickly :)*In case I am explaining badly due to my limited knowledge of hermitian and hamiltonian things, the exact question says...

Show for any operator [tex]\hat{O}[/tex], that [tex]\hat{O}[/tex] + [tex]\hat{O}[/tex][tex]\dagger[/tex] is Hermitian.

edit: sigh, spelt the title wrong :(
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What is a Hamiltonian operator? You mean THE hamiltonian? Or did you mean to say a Hermitian operator? Or a Hilbert operator?

[tex]O + O^\dagger[/tex] is always Hermitian. Use the fact that [tex]{O^\dagger}^\dagger = O[/tex].
 
  • #3
and use the fact that
[tex]
A+B=B+A
[/tex]
 
  • #4
Sorry, I think I meant Hermitian operators. Thank you for the replies but it doesn't help me very much but I think that's maybe because I am asking hthe question wrong! :S

What I am asking is how I would recognise the answer as a Hermitian in particular? Is it hermitian because...

([tex]\hat{O}[/tex][tex]^{dagger}[/tex])[tex]^{dagger}[/tex]

is [tex]\hat{O}[/tex] and thus Hermitian and thus because Hermitian Operators are commutative Hermitian + Hermitian = Hermitian ?
 
  • #5
Well you basically have everything you need:

i) a hermitian operator fulfills: [tex]\hat{O}^{\dagger} = \hat{O} [/tex]

ii) [tex]A+B=B+A[/tex]

Then what is:

[tex] (\hat{O} + \hat{O}^{\dagger}) ^{\dagger} [/tex]

?
 
  • #6
oh i see, so...

[tex](\hat{O} + \hat{O}^{\dagger}) ^{\dagger}[/tex] = [tex]\hat{O}^{\dagger} + \hat{O}^{\dagger}^{\dagger}[/tex] = [tex]\hat{O} + \hat{O}^{\dagger}[/tex]

thus proving it is hermitian. Ok, so, in a similar vein...

[tex]\hat{O}\hat{O}^{\dagger}[/tex] = [tex](\hat{O}\hat{O}^{\dagger}) ^{\dagger}[/tex] = [tex]\hat{O}^{\dagger}\hat{O}^{\dagger}^{\dagger}[/tex] = [tex]\hat{O}\hat{O}^{\dagger}[/tex]

thus proving IT is hermitian ?
 
  • #7
Bunting said:
Ok, so, in a similar vein...

[tex]\hat{O}\hat{O}^{\dagger}[/tex] = [tex](\hat{O}\hat{O}^{\dagger}) ^{\dagger}[/tex] = [tex]\hat{O}^{\dagger}\hat{O}^{\dagger}^{\dagger}[/tex] = [tex]\hat{O}\hat{O}^{\dagger}[/tex]

thus proving IT is hermitian ?

The end result is correct, but the second-last equality is wrong.
 
  • #8
I don't understand, you now want to PROOVE that [tex]\hat{O}[/tex] is a hermitian operator? That is a property that is given to you as a fact, you can't proove that unless you know what [tex]\hat{O}[/tex] explicity is. Or do you want to proove that given [tex]\hat{O}[/tex] is hermitian, the product [tex]\hat{O}\hat{O}^{\dagger}[/tex] is hermitian?


By the way: [tex] (AB)^{\dagger} = B^{\dagger}A^{\dagger}[/tex] so:

[tex] (\hat{O}\hat{O}^{\dagger}) ^{\dagger} = (\hat{O}^{\dagger})^{\dagger}\hat{O}^{\dagger} [/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #9
malawi_glenn said:
Or do you want to proove that given [tex]\hat{O}[/tex] is hermitian, the product [tex]\hat{O}\hat{O}^{\dagger}[/tex] is hermitian?
Yes that's correct :) Sorry, I have difficulty explaining things I don't understand very well, but I am getting there.

The point of these seems to be that if you can conjugate the example and get back to your origonal statement then your statement is Hermitian (or at least this is the point of the questions it would seem).
 
Last edited:
  • #10
yes, that is the thing you want to do. Then you must do as I told you in post #8
 
  • #11
malawi_glenn said:
yes, that is the thing you want to do. Then you must do as I told you in post #8
Aye I did thanks! :)

Great, thank you all for your help!
 
  • #12
Bunting said:
Aye I did thanks! :)

Great, thank you all for your help!

Great, so you agree with me that

[tex](\hat{O}\hat{O}^{\dagger}) ^{\dagger} \neq \hat{O}^{\dagger}\hat{O}^{\dagger}^{\dagger} [/tex]

?
 
  • #13
Yeah, I was basically just being rubbish at maths/not thinking about it properly.
 

1. What is a Hamiltonian question?

A Hamiltonian question is a type of question that relates to the Hamiltonian function in physics. This function is used to describe the total energy of a system and is commonly used in classical mechanics and quantum mechanics.

2. How is a Hamiltonian question different from other types of questions?

A Hamiltonian question is different from other types of questions because it specifically refers to the Hamiltonian function and its applications in physics. It is more specialized and typically requires a deeper understanding of physics concepts to answer.

3. Can you give an example of a Hamiltonian question?

An example of a Hamiltonian question would be: "How does the Hamiltonian function change in a closed system when energy is added or removed?" This question directly relates to the principles of conservation of energy and the role of the Hamiltonian function in describing energy changes in a system.

4. What are some common real-world applications of Hamiltonian questions?

Hamiltonian questions have many applications in the fields of physics, chemistry, and engineering. They are commonly used to analyze the behavior of complex systems, such as chemical reactions, electronic circuits, and physical systems with multiple particles.

5. How can I learn more about Hamiltonian questions and their applications?

If you are interested in learning more about Hamiltonian questions, you can start by studying classical mechanics and quantum mechanics, as these are the fields where the Hamiltonian function is used extensively. There are also many online resources and textbooks available that cover the topic in more detail.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
202
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
696
Replies
5
Views
905
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
262
Back
Top