A hypothesis of the basic working of the physical reality.

  • Thread starter Thread starter uros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physical Reality
AI Thread Summary
The hypothesis proposes that physical reality consists of a homogeneous existence that is self-contained and solely exists. Space is defined as having a finite, perfectly spherical shape that occupies the void, which is described as infinite and amorphous. This "nothing" surrounding space is deemed inaccessible from within it. The discussion invites comments but is currently closed for moderation. Overall, the hypothesis presents a unique perspective on the nature of space and existence.
uros
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I've been developing a hypothesis about how the physical reality must be like and work.

The physical reality would be composed by a homogeneous existence that is made up by itself, that solely exists.
This is how I defined space.
The space has a finite and perfectly spherical shape that fills the nothing and is surrounded by it.The nothing is infinite and amorphous, being inaccessible through the space.
continue...
leave your comments
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Inclined treadmills and Galilean Invariance'

This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

What does Alain Connes think of Tegmark's hypothesis?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Independent Researcher in Theoretical Physics, AI, and Advanced Structural Engineering
Replies
3
Views
81
Speed of our reality perception…
Replies
35
Views
7K
B Does anybody think that there is an underlying reality?
Replies
1
Views
2K
B How do the candidates for Dark Energy 'work'?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Balloon experiment - Classical Physics vs. Statistical Physics
Replies
16
Views
2K
Starship Hull Shape Analysis: Discuss the Reality of Sci-Fi
Replies
10
Views
3K
I Physics: Science and Understanding or Tool of Prediction
Replies
19
Views
2K
I Physical Universe vs. Simulated Universe
Replies
3
Views
2K
Is Ultimate Reality Continuous or Discontinuous?
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top