B A Magnetic Misconception on Divergence 0/Closed Field Lines?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether closed magnetic field lines imply that magnetic forces do no net work, questioning the misconception surrounding this concept. It draws a parallel to electric fields, noting that closed field lines between opposite electric charges do not prevent work from being done on those charges. The conversation highlights that while magnetic forces may not do work on charges in a closed loop, electric fields can still perform work despite having closed lines, as seen in the case of an electric dipole. The key takeaway is that the presence of closed field lines does not inherently mean that no work can be done by the associated forces. Understanding the distinction between magnetic and electric fields is crucial in this context.
walkeraj
Messages
17
Reaction score
4
Question: Can we ultimately atttribute no work or net zero work done by a magnetic force to the closed magnetic field lines that results in Divergence zero of a magnetic field? That is, is it a misconception to say that closed magnetic field lines imply magnetic force will always result in no net work?

(I meant misconception on my part not theory.)

Edit: Why misconception? Now switch to electric field. The field lines between two opposite electric test charges are also closed and resemble that of a bar magnet, though electric in nature. Does it hold? Is it enough to say that since the field lines are closed between the two test charges that no net work can ever be done?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Work done by a magnetic force on what ? Electric charge ?
 
Electric charge is all I can see (thinking back to Griffith's book).
 
Consider the electric field of an idealized electric dipole. It has only closed field lines, but it can do work on a charge.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Off resonance driving of a MW/RF cavity'

Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Seeing both B field lines and E field lines at the same time
Replies
22
Views
2K
I Field Strength of Permanent Magnets -- Inverse square or inverse cube?
Replies
9
Views
1K
I Magnetic field when the area of the plates of a capacitor increases
Replies
7
Views
1K
B Why does a magnet attract metal objects?
Replies
2
Views
1K
B Why does my LC circuit not oscillate its energy between Electric & Magnetic fields?
4
Replies
152
Views
6K
B Magnetic force driving a small iron ball
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Permanent magnets and energy question
Replies
16
Views
2K
I Divergence of v x B = Divergence of E in the v=0 frame?
Replies
7
Views
3K
B Understanding the electric field
Replies
16
Views
1K
B Curious about the uniform electric field between metal plates
Replies
8
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top