A potential well with 3-fold reflection symmetry

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around applying Bloch's theorem and the tight-binding approximation to find eigenstates in a system with three-fold reflection symmetry. The user expresses confusion about how to start the problem and seeks guidance on the application of these concepts. They understand that Bloch's theorem allows for a wavefunction that combines a plane wave with a periodic function but need help in practical application. The request emphasizes the desire for a collaborative discussion rather than direct answers, highlighting the need for clarity in understanding the topic. Overall, the thread seeks to foster a supportive dialogue to navigate the complexities of the homework problem.
lazayama
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Photos are attached below, with figures
Relevant Equations
Bloch's theorem: $$\psi(r)=e^{ikr}u(r)$$
Simultaneous eigenstates of Hamiltonian and Translational operator: $$|\theta>=\Sigma_{n=0} ^{N-1}|n>*e^{in\theta} $$
When we are talking about Bloch's theorem and also the tight-binding approximation, we can use them to help finding eigenstates of a system. However, I am so confused how to apply it in this case (below is my homework) and don't even know how to start it...

All I understand about the Bloch's theorem is that we can find a wavefunction that is a product of plane wave and a periodic function.

This will be great if someone can discuss it with me and direct my thinking...This may be a silly question but I am really lost here... I am not asking for direct answer but I really need a hand on this, so a solid discussion would be really helpful.

Thanks in advance!

Untitled.png

Untitled2.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any comments or suggestions would be highly appreciated, really!
 
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...