A Problem from "Incandescence" - Comments

  • Insights
  • Thread starter pervect
  • Start date
  • #1
pervect
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
9,679
914

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
PeterDonis
Mentor
Insights Author
2019 Award
28,357
8,097
Figure 2 shows a sketch of the map seen "head on" that was sketched in perspective in figure 1.
If the arrows are supposed to show the direction of proper acceleration required for a body to keep the same spatial position on the plane, their directions are backwards. The arrow directions shown are the directions of geodesic deviation due to tidal gravity, i.e., the directions in which neighboring geodesics will move relative to each other. The direction of proper acceleration required to keep neighboring worldlines from deviating will be opposite to the direction of geodesic deviation.
 
  • #3
pervect
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
9,679
914
The convention I used has the weights point in the direction the object would move if it were force-free. To give an example, if I were drawing arrows for weights on the Earth, using the convention I used in my diagram, the arrows representing weight would point "downwards", towards the center of the Earth. I didn't really think much about the convention to be honest, I just used what seemed natural to me.
 
  • #4
PeterDonis
Mentor
Insights Author
2019 Award
28,357
8,097
The convention I used has the weights point in the direction the object would move if it were force-free.
I'm not sure this is a matter of convention, unless you are also treating the term "weight" as a matter of convention. In the usual usage, "weight" is a force and its direction should be a direct observable, which must be describable by an invariant. "The direction the object would move if it were force-free" seems more like geodesic deviation to me.
 
  • #5
pervect
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
9,679
914
I revised the insights article considerably from the original pair of posts, in order to distinguish "weight" from "four-acceleration", I hope that addresses the point that was raised.
 

Related Threads on A Problem from "Incandescence" - Comments

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
647
Replies
9
Views
936
Replies
8
Views
888
Replies
16
Views
845
Replies
1
Views
846
Replies
146
Views
8K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Top