A problem regarding power output in cycling

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter martonhorvath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Incline Power
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the investigation of the significance of the athletes' power-to-weight ratio (W/kg) versus the power-to-drag coefficient ratio (W/CdA) in cycling performance. The analysis is framed within the context of different scenarios, particularly focusing on how incline and speed affect these ratios. Participants explore the underlying equations and concepts related to gravitational and air resistance forces during cycling.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a model to express the threshold incline where gravitational power equals air resistance power, suggesting that W/kg may be more significant under certain conditions.
  • Another participant requests clarification on the definitions of terms used in the equations, indicating potential confusion regarding the variables involved.
  • There is a correction from the original poster regarding a missing multiplication factor in their equations, which alters the expression for incline.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about the clarity of the original post and suggests that a diagram could aid in understanding the model being discussed.
  • Questions arise about the definitions of weight and mass in the context of the equations, as well as the consistency of variable usage (W vs. P for power).
  • One participant suggests comparing the challenges of cycling uphill versus riding into a headwind, indicating a practical perspective on the problem being analyzed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and clarity regarding the original equations and concepts. There is no consensus on the correctness of the calculations or the model presented, and multiple viewpoints on the significance of the ratios remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the need for clearer definitions and consistent terminology, as well as the potential benefits of visual aids to support the mathematical reasoning. The discussion reflects a mix of exploratory reasoning and technical challenges without definitive conclusions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying cycling dynamics, sports science, or anyone exploring the interplay between physical forces and performance metrics in athletic contexts.

martonhorvath
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I would need some help verifying my approach to a problem in Newtonian mechanics with a practical approach. Any additional insights are welcome as well!
Hi!

As written in the summary, I would like to get feedback about my approach to an issue I wanted to explore. In the example I am using cycling, but principally the same theory would apply to similar sports as well.

So, the problem was that I wanted to investigate whether the athletes' W/kg ratio or W/CdA ratio matters more in different scenarios. Of course, the answer should be highly incline- and speed-dependent.
To solve the question, I wanted to express a threshold incline (##\alpha##) at which the ratio of ##P_{gravitational} = P_{air}##, accepting the preconception that W/kg will 'matter' more in terms of performance if power against gravity is greater than power against air resistance.

So when expressing power as ##P = P_{gravity} + P_{rolling res.} + P_{air}##, (not accounting for minor losses such as loss due to the friction of the drivetrain), my initial equation looked like this:

$$\frac {P-P_{rolling}} {2} = P_{grav} = P_{air}$$

as follows:

$$\frac {P - C_{rr} mg cos(\alpha)} {2} = mg sin(\alpha) = 0.5 × C_{d}A×\rho×v^3$$

where m is the weight of the cyclist, ##C_{rr}## is the rolling resistance coefficient, etc.

When expressing P, it follows that:

$$P = mg(2sin(\alpha) + C_{rr}cos(\alpha))$$

$$\frac {P} {mg} = 2sin(\alpha) + C_{rr}cos(\alpha))$$

let's define ##k= \frac {P} {mg}##, so the equation can be expressed as:

$$k = \sqrt {4 + C_{rr}^2} (\frac {2} {\sqrt {4+C_{rr}^2}} × sin(\alpha) + \frac {C_{rr}} {\sqrt {4+C_{rr}^2}} × cos(\alpha))$$.

If ##R = \sqrt {4 + C_{rr}^2}##, ##cos(\beta) = \frac {2} {R}## and ##sin(\beta) = \frac {\mu} {R}##,

$$k = R(sin(\alpha)cos(\beta)+cos(\alpha)sin(\beta)$$.

After sine addition:

$$k = R × sin(\alpha+\beta) $$

$$\alpha = arcsin(\frac {k} {R} - \beta)$$

where $$\beta = arctan (\frac {C_{rr}} {2})$$

therefore

$$\alpha = arcsin (\frac {\frac {P} {mg}} {\sqrt {4+C_{rr}}}) - arctan (\frac {C_{rr}} {2})$$


Can someone validate my initial thoughts and assure me that my calculations are correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
martonhorvath said:
So, the problem was that I wanted to investigate whether the athletes' W/kg ratio or W/CdA ratio matters more in different scenarios.
Can you please define your terms?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
##C_{d}A## - coefficient of air drag, ##C_{rr}## - rolling resistance, ##P## - overall power output, ##\alpha## - incline, ##\rho## - density of air, ##m## - weight of the cyclists. I think everything else should be trivial or explained in the original post.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: Juanda
martonhorvath said:
##C_{d}A## - coefficient of air drag, ##C_{rr}## - rolling resistance, ##P## - overall power output, ##\alpha## - incline, ##\rho## - density of air, ##m## - weight of the cyclists. I think everything else should be trivial or explained in the original post.
Related to the part highlighted by you, these are supposed to be metrics describing performance. Power output normalized to body weight (W/kg) and power normalized to the coefficient of air drag (##W/C_{d}A##).
 
I realized that I left out multiplication by ##v## on the right side in the beginning when typing my post. Therefore the correct expression for ##\alpha## should look like as:

$$\alpha = arcsin(\frac {P} {mgv\sqrt {4+\mu^2}}) - arctan(\frac {\mu} {2})$$
 
Let me first say things are not as clear in the post as you (@martonhorvath ) may think. At least I'm not sure of what I'm reading and @berkeman raised the same concern. That works against you because it makes discussing this situation much harder. Whenever creating these posts I'd recommend uploading a diagram of what you are trying to model. From what you have described, this is what I believe you're trying to model.

(As a simplification, I'll treat the cyclist as a block. I'll assume all forces are passing through the center of mass anyway so the shape is irrelevant)

1719953541314.png


Where:
  • ##F_m## is the motorization force. What the cyclist would be doing to go uphill.
  • ##mg## is the weight.
  • ##N## is the normal force stopping it from going through the floor.
  • ##F_{Cd}## is the friction with the air.
  • ##F_\mu## is the friction with the ground.
  • ##\dot{x}## is the velocity of the cyclist and will be considered constant.
Your objective is to check for the necessary ##F_m## to fulfill the condition of constant velocity and then check how that relates to certain ratios.

Is that an accurate description of your objective?

If it is, that diagram should already help you set up / verify the equations. You can do it either with Newton or through conservation of energy (power generated = power dissipated).
I honestly tried following your equations step by step and I make sense out of them. Either they are wrong or the path you chose to solve it is so different from what I have in my head now that it doesn't make sense to me at the moment.
 
martonhorvath said:
##m## - weight of the cyclists.
##m## is weight or mass? What are the units of measure?

martonhorvath said:
Related to the part highlighted by you, these are supposed to be metrics describing performance. Power output normalized to body weight (W/kg) and power normalized to the coefficient of air drag (##W/C_{d}A##).
##W## is weight or power? You've used ##P## for power elsewhere.
 
martonhorvath said:
TL;DR Summary: I would need some help verifying my approach to a problem in Newtonian mechanics with a practical approach. Any additional insights are welcome as well!

As written in the summary, I would like to get feedback about my approach to an issue I wanted to explore. In the example I am using cycling, but principally the same theory would apply to similar sports as well.

So, the problem was that I wanted to investigate whether the athletes' W/kg ratio or W/CdA ratio matters more in different scenarios. Of course, the answer should be highly incline- and speed-dependent.

So beyond you hopefully clarifying the variables and unit in your posts, it sounds like you want to compare the difficulty of a headwind versus a hill climb for a cyclist (and similar athletic events). One approach might be to equate the hindrance and extra effort to ride into a headwind of a certain velocity to the extra effort required for an equivalent percent grade of a hillclimb.

I have climbed lots of hills on my bikes, and had the misfortune to ride into some crazy headwinds. Which to you think I found more difficult? :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
5K