Undergrad A problem with a figure related to band theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the interpretation of diagrams related to band theory in solid state physics, specifically addressing the misleading representation of energy level splittings in a figure. Participants clarify that part (a) illustrates single atom states, part (b) depicts multiple atoms with incorrect splitting representations, and part (c) shows a continuum of energy levels as more atoms are added. The confusion arises from the depiction in part (b), which inaccurately mixes twofold and fourfold splittings, leading to misconceptions about ground state behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of solid state physics concepts, particularly band theory.
  • Familiarity with Pauli's exclusion principle and its implications on energy levels.
  • Knowledge of atomic energy levels and their behavior in multi-atom systems.
  • Experience with interpreting scientific diagrams and figures in physics literature.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Kittel's and Ashcroft's textbooks for comprehensive explanations of band theory.
  • Study the implications of Pauli's principle on energy level splitting in solid state systems.
  • Examine various diagrams of band theory to identify common misconceptions.
  • Explore advanced topics in solid state physics, such as the density of states and its relation to energy levels.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in solid state physics, physicists analyzing band theory, and anyone involved in teaching or learning about atomic energy levels and their representations in diagrams.

DaTario
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
46
TL;DR
Hi, All, I would like to know the following figure is ok in the context of explaining to beginers the theory of bands (solid state physics).
Hi, All. In searching for images related to the introduction of band theory in solid sate physics I found this one:
1632510900492.png


I would like to ask you if I am correct in thinking the increase in the number of splittings (in b) is misleading to students.

Thank you all

DaTario
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First: where did you get this diagram?

Ok, now on to an explanation:
Part (a) looks like a set of single atom states.
Part (b) is for multiple atoms in a lattice, looks like two.
Part (c) is for a many atom lattice
 
These kind of drawings are quite common and I've seen them in several books. The "idea" is that you start with a single atom and you have the standard atom energy levels (drawing a). With two close atoms we must split the atom levels to satify Pauli's principle (the splitting is shown very large to ease reading, drawing b). You keep adding many, many atoms until the discrete energy levels split in so many levels that the system looks like a continuum (drawing c). Kittel's or Ashcroft's books take this approach to introduce the subject
 
Dr Transport said:
First: where did you get this diagram?
Thank you for the answers.

I got it from image googling with key word "band theory solid state physics".

It seems that (b) shows neither a twofold splitting nor a fourfold splitting. So it seemed confusing to me.
 
Gordianus said:
These kind of drawings are quite common and I've seen them in several books. The "idea" is that you start with a single atom and you have the standard atom energy levels (drawing a). With two close atoms we must split the atom levels to satify Pauli's principle (the splitting is shown very large to ease reading, drawing b). You keep adding many, many atoms until the discrete energy levels split in so many levels that the system looks like a continuum (drawing c). Kittel's or Ashcroft's books take this approach to introduce the subject
I understand it. I am worried with the drawings in (b), because it seems to show in one figure a mix of a twofold and a fourfold splitting.

It also bothered me that the figure also suggests that the ground state does not suffer any kind of split.
 
It does indeed look wrong, each single particle state should split into as many states as there are particles in the system.
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K