A question about dark energy and the expansion/acceleration of the Universe.

AI Thread Summary
The universe is currently accelerating in its expansion, primarily due to dark energy, which exerts a "repulsive force" counteracting gravity on large scales. This acceleration has been measured using Type IA supernovae, whose brightness diminishes with redshift if the universe is accelerating. The presence of dark energy, characterized by negative pressure, is essential in explaining this acceleration. Observations confirm that the universe's expansion is not only ongoing but also increasing over time. Understanding dark energy is crucial to grasping the dynamics of the universe's expansion.
Pattonias
Messages
196
Reaction score
0
I was curious about whether or not the Universe was accelerating or decelerating and how we could know one way or another.

I read an article I found online http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=63" and it said that, among other things, that the universe is accelerating partly due to dark energy and its "repulsive force of empty space that counteracts gravity on large scales." I had never heard of anything actually "repulsive" to gravity and was wondering if this was right or wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It is correct that the expansion of the universe is accelerating. The way this has been typically measured is to look at things, typically Type IA supernovae, which we know how bright they should be. If the universe is accelerating then they'll look less bright as a function of redshift than they would if the universe wasn't accelerating.

It can indeed be shown that a term with negative pressure, like dark energy, causes the expansion of the universe to accelerate.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top