A Question about the Alternating Series Test

mscudder3
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
The definition I am working from is "Let Z=(z(sub n)) be a decreasing sequence of strictly positive numbers with lim(Z)=0. Then the alternating series, Sum(((-1)^n)*Z) is convergent.

My question is how to solve the following:
If the hypothesis that Z is decreasing is dropped, show the Alternating Series Test may fail.

I am aware of a proof utilizing some Z that is also alternating, but this breaks the condition that Z is strictly positive. I am unaware of an such sequence that has a limit of 0, all elements of the series are positive, yet is divergent.

This question is due within 10 hours. Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at a sequence whose odd terms are a convergent sequence of positive terms, like a geometric series and whose even terms are the terms of the divergent harmonic series {1/n}. The alternating sequence of negative odd terms and positive even terms should diverge. Intuitively this is because what is begin taken away reaches a limit while what is being added doesn't.

It will be a slight nuisance to get the indexing written correctly. I think harmonic terms will be \frac{1}{ (n/2)+1} , for n = 0,2,4,...
 
Thanks!

I never really assessed the thought of a limit being reached while another series (running in parallel) continued decreasing. I appreciate the quick input!
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top