A question from Landau's quantum mechanics

Dale12
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
In $9 after (9.1) in Landau's book <quantum mechanics>,I read a notation under there about (9.2) that: when operation i(Hf-fH) translate to classical limit, the first order is zero,and the second order is h[H,f],why? I just can't understand why the first order is zero(because u could substite sth to it and so Hf-fH=0?),and how does the second order be h[H,f],is there anything like pq=h here? I read Dirac's mechanics once but he did not tell it more clearly how the i and h appear, and here I was amazed again.thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The notation (9.2) in Landau's quantum mechanics refers to the commutator of two operators, H and f. The commutator is defined as [H,f] = HF - fH, where H and f are operators and F is the function that they operate on. In the classical limit, where h (Planck's constant) goes to zero, the first order term in the commutator, i.e. HF, becomes negligible compared to the second order term, i.e. fH. This is because in the classical limit, the operators H and f become commuting variables, and their product is the same regardless of the order in which they are multiplied. This is why the first order term becomes zero.

The second order term, h[H,f], is related to the fundamental relationship between position and momentum in quantum mechanics, known as the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. This principle states that the more precisely we know the position of a particle, the less precisely we can know its momentum, and vice versa. In other words, the product of the uncertainties in position and momentum must be greater than or equal to h/2. This is where the factor of h appears in the second order term, as it is related to the uncertainty in momentum.

In Dirac's mechanics, he also uses the notation of the commutator to describe the fundamental relationship between position and momentum. However, he does not explicitly mention the factor of h, as he uses a different set of units that absorb this factor. But the concept remains the same.

I hope this helps to clarify the notation and the appearance of i and h in Landau's quantum mechanics. It is a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics and can be difficult to grasp at first, but with practice and further study, it will become clearer.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top