A question in prooving liniar operator

  • Thread starter Thread starter transgalactic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding a linear operator defined by the formula T(A) = AT - A, particularly in the context of 2x2 matrices. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the notation used in the formula and its application to polynomials versus matrices.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the meaning of the notation used in the formula, questioning whether AT refers to a power or the transpose of a matrix. There is also uncertainty about the notation resembling a derivative sign and its implications for the operator.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the standard notation for matrix operations and suggesting that the original poster seek clarification from their textbook or teacher. There is a suggestion that the notation may be a printing error.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential for confusion due to non-standard notation and the importance of understanding whether the matrix entries are real or complex numbers, as this affects the interpretation of the operator.

transgalactic
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
0
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what you mean by "for a polynomial". The formula is T(A)= AT- A.

Perhaps you are thinking that AT is a power? Even if it were, that would still be alright- if you can multiply matrices you can certainly take a matrix to a power- and a product of matrices still represents a linear transformation.

However, AT is the standard notation for the 'transpose' of a matrix: basically you swap rows and columns. For a 2 by 2 matrix
\left[\begin{array}{cc}a & b \\ c & d\end{array}\right]^T= \left[\begin{array}{cc} a & c \\ b & d\end{array}\right]
so that
\left[\begin{array}{cc}a &amp; b \\ c &amp; d\end{array}\right]^T- \left[\begin{array}{cc}a &amp; b \\ c &amp; d\end{array}\right]= \left[\begin{array}{c c} a &amp; c \\ b &amp; d\end{array}\right]- \left[\begin{array}{cc}a &amp; b \\ c &amp; d\end{array}\right][/itex]<br /> = \left[\begin{array}{cc} 0 &amp;amp; c- b \\ b- c &amp;amp; 0\end{array}\right]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
no this sign is a little line like a derivative sign
no way it can't be a T
??
 
then I have no idea what it means- it's not a standard notation. Does your book give a definition? If not, ask your teacher.
 
i trust your judgement probably its a print mistake
and they ment T
 
It's my vision I'm not sure you should trust! Is this matrix over the real numbers or complex numbers? Sometimes a little "sword" superscript is use to represent the "Hermitian conjugate" where you take the transpose (switch rows to columns) and take the complex conjugate of all entries. Of course, if your matrix has only real number entries, that is the same as the transpose.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K