A quick explanation of stability?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dillonmhudson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explanation Stability
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the stability of equilibrium points for the differential equation y' = y(1 - y^2). The critical points identified are y = 0, y = 1, and y = -1. It is established that y = -1 and y = 1 are stable equilibria, as values near these points will move toward them, while y = 0 is an unstable equilibrium, where nearby values will move away from it. The analysis includes the behavior of y for various initial conditions, confirming the stability characteristics of each critical point.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations, specifically first-order equations.
  • Familiarity with equilibrium points and their stability analysis.
  • Knowledge of the concepts of increasing and decreasing functions.
  • Basic calculus, including derivatives and anti-derivatives.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the stability of nonlinear differential equations using phase plane analysis.
  • Learn about Lyapunov stability criteria for assessing equilibrium points.
  • Explore the graphical interpretation of equilibria through phase portraits.
  • Investigate the role of perturbations in the stability of dynamical systems.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of differential equations, and anyone interested in the stability analysis of dynamical systems will benefit from this discussion.

dillonmhudson
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I have the following DE:
y'=y*(1-y^2)
And understand that y=0, and y=+/-1 are critical points

I am confused as to which are stable/unstable and why.

TIA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, y'= y(1- y)(1+ y) so y= 0, 1, and -1 give "equilibrium solutions". If, at any time, y is equal to one of those, its derivative is 0 so it doesn't change- those are constant solutions.

Now, look at what happens for other initial values of y. Suppose, for some t, y< -1.
Then all three of y and 1+ y are negative bur 1- y is positive so their product is positive. That is, y'> 0 so y is increasing, moving toward -1.

Suppose y lies between -1 and 0. Then y is still negative but both 1- y and 1+ y are positive. Their product is negative so now y' is negative. Now y is decreasing but that means it is still movin g toward -1.

If y is some value close to -1, whether above or below, y(t) moves toward -1. That is what "stable equilibrium" means- if y is close to the equilibrium point but not exactly equal to it, y(t) will stay close or even move toward it.

Of course, since y(t) is decreasing for -1< y< 0, it is moving away from 0. If y is between 0 and 1, now all three of y, 1- y and 1+ y are positive so their product, and therefore y' is positive. y is increasing and so is moving away from 0. That is, if y is close to the equilibrium value, 0, it will move away from that value. That means that y= 0 is an unstable equilibrium- values near there do NOT stay near it.

Of course, for 0< x< 1, since y is increasing, it is moving toward y= 1. And, if y is larger than 1, y and 1+ y are positive but now 1- y is negative. Their product is negative which means y' is negative. y is decreasing and again moving toward 1. That is, if y is close to 1 but not exactly at 1, whether above or below 1, it will move toward 1. That is a "stable" equilibrium.

Another way of thinking about this- if you look at the anti-derivative of [itex]y(1- y^2)[/itex], [itex](1/2)y^2- (1/4)y^4[/itex] you will see a quartic graph that has a minimum at x= 1, a maximum at x= 0, and a second minimum at x=-1. If you think of that as representing a hill between two valleys, if you were to set a ball on the hill at x= 0, it will not immediately roll away because it is balanced there (so it is in "equilibrium"). But the slightest disturbance would knock it off that hill and start it rolling downward. That is an "unstable" equilibrium. If, instead, you set the ball at either of the two valleys, at x=-1 or x= 1, A slight disturbance might start the ball rocking but it would roll back to the bottom of the valley. Those are "stable" equilibria.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow thanks so much for the helpful reply!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K