A simple integral - I don't agree with Maple.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Levis2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Maple
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
Levis2
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Evaluate the integral;
[tex]\int[/tex]2x/(2x+3) dx

The Attempt at a Solution


Now i start out substituting u=2x+3
Then i get;
[tex]\int[/tex]2x/u dx

Now i express dx by du;
u=2x+3
du/dx=2x/ln(2)
(du*ln(2))/2x=dx

This expression of dx is inserted into my integral, and the 2^x's cancel out;
[tex]\int[/tex]2x/u (du*ln(2))/2x
This simplifies to;
[tex]\int[/tex]ln(2)/u du
Where ln(2) is simply a constant (atleast that's what i think)
so ln(2)[tex]\int[/tex]1/u
And the integral becomes;
ln(2)*ln(u)

Substituting back into the integral;

ln(2)*ln(2x+3)

Now maple didn't give me this result. Instead it gave me the following;
ln(2x+3)/ln(2)

Any idea of what I've done wrong ? :P
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would recheck your du/dx calculation.
 
haha oops :P the derivative should be 2^x*ln(2) .. my mistake :)