A solution of Euler's equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter coverband
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euler's equation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the pressure, P(x,t), in a fluid with a given velocity vector and constant density, using Euler's equation. The context is fluid dynamics, specifically related to the behavior of a fluid under body forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the gradient of pressure and the velocity vector, with attempts to derive P from the provided equations. Questions are raised about the interpretation of the del operator and the process of solving the resulting partial differential equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different aspects of the problem, including the implications of the del operator and the nature of the equations involved. Some guidance is provided regarding treating the equations as ordinary differential equations with respect to a fixed parameter.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of an arbitrary function of time that arises during the integration process, and participants note confusion between the terms "delta" and "nabla," indicating potential misunderstandings in notation.

coverband
Messages
170
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The velocity vector for a flow is u = (xt, yt, -2zt). Given that the density is constant and that the body force is F = (0,0,-g) find the pressure, P(x,t) in the fluid which satisfies P = P_0(t) at x = 0


Homework Equations


Euler's equation: \frac{Du}{Dt}=-\frac{1}{\rho}\nabla P + F


The Attempt at a Solution



\nabla P = \rho(-x-xt^2, -y - yt^2, 2z - 4zt^2 - g)
How do you get P from this. Back of the book gives
P = - \frac {1}{2} \rho (x^2+y^2)(1+t^2) + \rho z^2(1-2t^2)-\rho gz + P_0(t)
How did they get that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
coverband said:
\nabla P = \rho(-x-xt^2, -y - yt^2, 2z - 4zt^2 - g)
How do you get P from this. Back of the book gives
What do you understand by the del operator? You simply have to solve a set of three partial differential equations to reconstruct P.
 
More specifically, you have
\frac{\partial P}{\partial x}= \rho(x- xt^2)= \rho(1- t^2)x
\frac{\partial P}{\partial y}= \rho(y- yt^2)= \rho(1- t^2)y
and
\frac{\partial P}{\partial z}= \rho(z- zt^2)= \rho(1- t^2)z

Which can be treated as three ordinary differential equations with 't' as a fixed parameter.
 
The arbitrary function of t comes into play as you're doing a partial integration, so when you take the gradient again, all functions of t get knocked out as you're doing partial differentiation.
 
Fightfish said:
What do you understand by the del operator? You simply have to solve a set of three partial differential equations to reconstruct P.

Thanks I was getting delta mixed up with nabla!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K