A solution to time dependent SE but not Time independent SE?

faen
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
A solution to time dependent SE but not Time independent SE??

How is it possible that a wave function is a solution to the time dependent schroedinger equation, but not to the time independent schroedinger equation (without time factors tacked on) with the same potential? I had this case on my quantum physics exam. I wrote that the time dependent set consisted of a linear combination of wavefunctions which were solutions from another potential which spanned hilbert space. But it still sounds contradicting that this function didnt fit into the time independent schroedinger equation when its basis functions span the space too.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well... yeah. if it is time dependent then it is not time-independent... so all time dependent solutions are not time-independent solutions.
 
yea but without the time dependence factor (t=0), wouldn't they be time independent too?
 
faen said:
yea but without the time dependence factor (t=0), wouldn't they be time independent too?

yes, but without the time-dependent factor then it is not the same function. in general the time-dependence doesn't factor.
 
the time independant schrodinger equation only applies when you can use separation of variables, while you could theoretically apply it at t=0 and get basis states for that particular instant, this would be of little use as the time evolution would be completely different.

so if you have a solution to the time independant equation this means the solution can be put in the form of e^(-iEt)y(x) whereas you can't do this for a solution to the time dependant solution
 
Asked my teacher and found out that linear combination of separable states as solution to SE don't apply to the time independent SE but only to the time dependent SE. Not even at t=0.
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top