1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A theorem on uniform convergence

  1. Dec 2, 2008 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Theorem to be proved:
    fn is uniformly convergent on E iff for every epsilon >0 there is an N, where n,m >= N then | fn(x) - fm(x) | < epsilon, for all x in E.

    2. Relevant equations
    Definition: fn is uniformly continuous on E if there is an f such that for every epsilon >0, there is an N such that for n >= N: | fn(x) - f(x) | < epsilon

    3. The attempt at a solution
    (only if):
    Assume fn is uniformly convergent. Then
    [tex]\forall x \in E, \forall n,m >= N, \left| f_n (x) - f(x) \right| < \frac{\epsilon}{2} and \left| f_m (x) - f(x) \right| < \frac{\epsilon}{2} [/tex] Thus
    [tex]\left| f_n (x) - f_m (x) \right| \leq \left| f_n (x) - f(x) + f(x) - f_m(x) \right| < \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \epsilon[/tex] Great.

    Now here comes the part I wish I was doing better. I just feel like something is off. So I have two ways.

    Way number 1):
    Assume [tex] \left| f_n (x) - f(x) \right| < \epsilon \forall x \in E, \forall m,n \geq N[/tex] . Then fn is cauchy, and because fn is cauchy, fn is bounded on E. Then let M = max{fn(x)} x in E. Also because fn is cauchy it is convergent, and because fn <= M for all x in E, fn is convergent for all x in E. By the definition of a convergent sequence | fn(x) - f(x) | < epsilon.

    Way number 2):
    Assume [tex] \left| f_n (x) - f_m(x) \right| < \epsilon \forall x \in E, \forall m,n \geq N[/tex]. Let f(x) be an accumulation point of \{f_n(x) : f \in E\} and, let n*>= N where [tex] f_{n*} \in (f(x) - \epsilon, f(x) + \epsilon) thus \left| f_{n*} (x) - f(x) \right| < \frac{\epsilon}{2} [/tex]. Therefore

    [tex] \left| f_n (x) - f(x) \right| = \left| f_n (x) - f_{n*}(x) + f_{n*}(x) - f(x) \right| \leq \left| f_n (x) - f_{n*}(x) \right| + \left| f_{n*}(x) (x) - f(x) \right| < \frac{\epsilon}{2} + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \epsilon \forall x \in E, \forall m,n \geq N[/tex]

    Way number two should work, but gets ugly. I don't think way number one works.
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2008
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 2, 2008 #2
    Assume fn is Cauchy. Then fn is bounded (easy to show). Thus it contains a convergent subsequence, call it gn. Let g = lim gn. By fn Cauchy we have |fn - fm| < e/2 and gn convergent to g implies |gn - g| < e/2
    So |fn - gn + gn - g| < (or equal) |fn - gn| + |gn - g| < e
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: A theorem on uniform convergence
  1. Uniform convergence (Replies: 3)

  2. Uniform convergence (Replies: 4)