A tight biinding calcualtion of graphene like structure

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mohsen2002
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphene Structure
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on the tight binding band structure of graphene, highlighting discrepancies between tight binding and DFT calculations, particularly at the Gamma (0,0) point in the first Brillouin zone (FBZ). It is established that the conduction and valence bands in tight binding should be symmetric about the Dirac point, while DFT results show asymmetry, with the valence band being flatter. To address this, incorporating a small next-nearest-neighbor coupling can help reproduce the observed asymmetry. The discussion also references the Dresselhaus-Dresselhaus book for further insights on basis states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Tight binding model for electronic band structure
  • Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations
  • Understanding of the first Brillouin zone (FBZ)
  • Familiarity with the Dresselhaus-Dresselhaus framework on nanotubes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of next-nearest-neighbor coupling in tight binding models
  • Explore the differences between DFT and tight binding band structure calculations
  • Study the properties of hexagonal Boron Nitride in electronic structure calculations
  • Examine the implications of non-orthogonal basis states in DFT calculations
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and students in condensed matter physics, materials scientists, and anyone involved in computational modeling of graphene and related materials.

mohsen2002
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I plot the tight binding bandstructure of graphene. There is a very good aggrement with ab-inition calculation in the valence band. but there is a problem in the non-localized orbitals of conduction band especially in the Gama(0,0) point.
Any suggestion is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you're comparing the results of a DFT calculation to a phenomenological nearest-neighbour tight-binding Hamiltonian then you should find that in the tight-binding band structure the conduction and valence bands are symmetric about the Dirac point (about the line E=0).

From a DFT calculation you should find that actually the two bands are not symmetric about this energy - the valence band appears to be flatter than the conduction band as far as I remember. I think this was due to the basis states not being mutually orthogonal (you should look in the Dresselhaus-Dresselhaus book on nanotubes).

If you want to reproduce the asymmetry between the two bands in the tight-binding Hamiltonian you can include a small next-nearest-neighbour coupling (say one tenth of the nearest-neighbour coupling).

If that doesn't help maybe you could just show us some plots and indicate what is wrong with them.
 
Thanks for your reply,
The effect of next nearest neighbor on the band structure is very small. My question is:
Why the mail problem is around the Gama (Kx=Ky=0) point in FBZ?
Here is a sample fitting for hexagonal Boron Nitride. (black line are DFT result and red line as a tight binding calculation)
 

Attachments

  • clip_image002.png
    clip_image002.png
    4.3 KB · Views: 558

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K