A weight of 15 lbs at sea level is suspended

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nornh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sea level Weight
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the peak load on a wire rope when a 15 lb weight is lifted and dropped 1 ft, with the initial velocity set to zero. The key point is that the problem lacks a precise answer due to the assumption of a non-stretching cable, which complicates the dynamics of the weight's deceleration. The abruptness of the weight's stop significantly influences the peak tension; however, without a defined instant for when the weight stops falling, the scenario becomes ambiguous. The weight's physical volume and the gradual deceleration process must be considered, as instantaneous deceleration would imply infinite force, which is not physically plausible. To provide an estimate of peak tension, a specific timeline for the weight's deceleration would be necessary.
Nornh
Yes, this is in regards to my first question.

A weight of 15 lbs at sea level is suspended by a wire rope that does not stretch. The weight is lifted 1 ft and dropped 1 ft. the initial velocity is "zero". What is the peak lb load on the wire when the weight stops falling?

Thanks for your reply.

This problem does not require a precise answer. I am looking for a plus or minus 5 lb answer. The missing factors that you have mentioned can be assumed in generalities. Is this enough information to come up with an answer?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
the peak tension will depend very much on how abruptly the
weight is assumed to stop falling.

in a normal problem this would be influenced by the stretch
of the cable----the less elastic the cable the more abruptly
the object halts and the greater the force.

but your problem is not a problem in physics
since the cable does not stretch, and also it is not well posed since (unless information can
move faster than light) there is no "when"

there is no well-defined instant in time "when the weight'
stops falling"

To see this, imagine that the cable is attached at the top of
the weight. the weight must occupy a physical volume, must
have for example a height, say like 4 inches, between
the bottom and the top where the cable is attached.

when the cable snaps taut it stops the top of the weight
from falling, but the rest of the weight does not know about this
yet and keeps on falling.

so the weight itself must stretch slightly (unless information travels thru the weight at infinite speed)

so the deceleration of the weight is not instantaneous

if any deceleration is instantaneous one can say that the force applied is infinite---but that is not a physical process

so the deceleration of the weight is GRADUAL according to some timetable. If you would somehow indicate the timetable for the weight to stop falling and it would be possible to estimate the peak tension "load" as you ask
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top