AAS of mercury in prescence of cobalt

  • Thread starter Thread starter Taryn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mercury
AI Thread Summary
Analyzing mercury in the presence of cobalt using atomic absorption analysis is challenging due to both elements emitting and absorbing radiation at 235.65 nm. Cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) is typically used for mercury, as it involves reducing mercury to its elemental form, which has a high vapor pressure. The discussion raises questions about the vapor pressure of zero valent cobalt, suggesting that this could impact the analysis. Participants are seeking hints and strategies to effectively differentiate between the two elements during measurement. Understanding the properties of both elements is crucial for successful analysis.
Taryn
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Just wondering how to analyse mercury in the presence of cobalt by atomic absorption analysis given that both elements emit and absorb radiation at 235.65nm.
I know that mercury isj examined using cold vapour atomic absorbtion analysis... but knowing this still doesn't help?

Any hints would be appreciated
cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Taryn said:
Just wondering how to analyse mercury in the presence of cobalt by atomic absorption analysis given that both elements emit and absorb radiation at 235.65nm.
I know that mercury isj examined using cold vapour atomic absorbtion analysis... but knowing this still doesn't help?

Cold vapour AAS is a method in which mercury is reduced in the sample to elemental mercury which has a fairly high vapor pressure. What do you suppose the vapor pressure of zero valent cobalt might be?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top