Can Symmetry Breaking on a Banquet Table Explain Bose States in Lasers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter touqra
  • Start date Start date
touqra
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
I read some paragraphs from Michio Kaku's Hyperspace about Abdus Salam's illustration of symmetry breaking using a banquet table. Left-right symmetry breaks when one diner picks a glass on the right or left.
What if two diners simultaneously picks up a glass. One diner picks up a glass to his right while the other picks up a glass to her left. In the end, surely, someone will have no glass to drink from. Right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you have an analogy or illustration, you have to be careful not to push it too far. The thing it illustrates is robust, but the illustration has traded robustness for clarity. A similar case is the idea of a balloon with stars painted on it being blown up to illustrate the expanding universe. It's meaningless to ask "What happens when the balloon bursts?"
 
I has to do with Bosons tending to go to the same state, so if a situation allows the formation of new Bose states, they will all tend to be identical, as in a Laser. If there are only two possiblities allowed, then they will all be in one of the two states.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top