About the Analytical Physics constraint writing.

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
opeth_35
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
About the Analytical Physics constraint writing...

I have added a photo about my problem. My problem is why did we write while calculating constraint values as d/2. you will see on the picture what I am saying, I cannot see the reason of writing d/2
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0460.jpg
    IMG_0460.jpg
    49.3 KB · Views: 481
Physics news on Phys.org


I guess from what I see, that [itex]d[/itex] is the diameter of the disc and [itex]\phi[/itex] is the angle the disc rotated. Then the radius of the disc would be [itex]d/2[/itex]. So the length of the string unwound will be radius times the angle rotated, or [itex]\frac{d}{2} \phi[/itex].
 


thank you for explaining :)