B Absolute Value Inequality, |x|>|x-1|....where's my mistake?

mishima
Messages
576
Reaction score
43
Rule:
Suppose a>0, then |x|>a if and only if x>a OR x<-a

So |x|>|x-1| becomes:

x>x-1 which is false (edit: or more accurately doesn't give the whole picture, it implies true for all x)

OR

x<-x+1
2x<1
x<1/2 which is false
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
On the right side of the equation, the absolute value of ## x-1 ## can change signs around the point ## x=1 ##. For a problem like this, I like to break it into segments where the absolute values will always keep the same sign=e,g. ## -\infty ## to ##0 ##, ## 0 ## to ## +1 ## , and ## +1 ## to ## +\infty ##, and evaluate the inequality for these 3 separate regions, and determining for each whether ##|x|=+x ##, or ## |x|=-x ##, and similarly for ## |x-1| ##.
 
Your mistake is that you use a rule that is valid for a fixed value. You identify a with ##|x-1|## but this is not a fixed value, since it depends on x. Therefore, the rule you listed cannot be used. See @Charles Link answer to see how you need to tackle this problem.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
How can |x-1| ever be not be > 0? Aren't absolute values always greater than 0?

Ah, I get it. You're right it could be the case that |x-1|=0, which would indeed break the stipulations of the rule. Thanks.
 
mishima said:
How can |x-1| ever be not be > 0? Aren't absolute values always greater than 0?

Ah, I get it. You're right it could be the case that |x-1|=0, which would indeed break the stipulations of the rule. Thanks.
It's not just a case of ## |x-1|=0 ##. The problem is that ## |x-1| ## can be equal to ## x-1 ## or it can be equal to ## 1-x ##. ## \\ ## ## |x-1 | ## is not simply some positive constant, so the rule does not apply. You can't just remove the absolute value signs on the right side of the inequality, and think that it won't have any effect. The rule you are trying to impose only had absolute value signs on one side of the inequality.
 
  • Like
Likes member 587159 and mishima
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top