Absolute value on both side of equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving an absolute value equation and clarifying the correct solution. The book's answer states that x must be greater than or equal to 0 or equal to -2/3. A mistake in the initial reasoning was identified, specifically the incorrect assumption that the expressions are equal for all real numbers. The correct approach involves breaking the equation into cases based on the absolute value properties, leading to the conclusion that x must be non-negative or specifically equal to -2/3 when the expression inside the absolute value equals zero. This method is applicable to similar absolute value equations.
ziaharipur
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I solved this absolute value equation and I am confuse about the answer given in the book for this question, the answer in the book is x > = 0 or x = -2/3 please tell me how can I get this answer from the following solution. Please tell the method which should be true for all such type of questions.
look at the image below
[PLAIN]http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/1577/imgsb.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ok well... one of the mistakes I see is how you reached the conclusion "3x +2 =3x +2 for all real nobs"

well, this isn't true... is it? ex: x= -1. |3(-1)+2(-1)| does not equal (-1)|3(-1)+2|.

Break it up like this:
{|3x^2 + 2x|= |x||3x+2| = x |3x + 2| } \Rightarrow { |x|=x , for (3x+2) \neq 0 }

Hence, this is true for all x \geq 0.

Now, separately consider the case (3x+2)=0. What do you get? x= -2/3

Note: LaTeX is being crazy!
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top