Abstract Algebra Homework: Proving H is a Subgroup of G

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a set H, defined as H={a^n: n∈Z} for an element a in a group G, is a subgroup of G. Participants are tasked with demonstrating three properties: closure under multiplication, the inclusion of the identity element, and the inclusion of inverses.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the properties of groups, particularly focusing on closure, identity, and inverses. Some express uncertainty about the necessity of a being in G and how it affects their proofs.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the properties required for H to be a subgroup. Some participants have provided partial reasoning for the properties, while others question the assumptions regarding the finiteness of G and the nature of the integers involved. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the assumption that G is finite, which may affect the validity of certain arguments. There is also a discussion about whether Z refers to all integers or only positive integers, which impacts the reasoning about inverses.

sutupidmath
Messages
1,629
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Let a be in a group G, and let

[tex]H=\{ a^n: n\in Z\}[/tex]. Show the following:

(i) if h and h' are in H, so is hh'.

(ii) The identity e of G is in H.

(iii) if h is in H, so is [tex]h^{-1}[/tex].

The Attempt at a Solution



Here is what i tried. First of all i am not sure that what i have done is correct, second i am not sure how a bein an element of G helps here. However i have tried to make use of such a fact in one or another way. Let's see:


(i) Let h and h' be in H, then both of them are of the form : [tex]h=a^{n_1} ; \ \ \ h'=a^{n_2}[/tex] where [tex]n_1,n_2\in Z[/tex] .

Now, since: [tex]a\in G=> a^{n_1},a^{n_2}\in G[/tex]

Then :

[tex]hh'=a^{n_1}a^{a_2}=a^{n_1+n_2}\in H[/tex], since [tex]n_1+n_2\in Z[/tex]. ( Note: This is also where i am not sure wheter i am properly making use of the fact that a is in G, because if a wouldn't be in G, then we would not be sure that we can have [tex]a^{n_1}[/tex] or [tex]a^{n_2}[/tex] right? or?


(ii) I am not sure on this one at all, here is what i said:

let [tex]e=a^0[/tex] be the identity element in G, so [tex]e=a^0\in H[/tex] since [tex]n=0\in Z[/tex]

(iii) Since [tex]h\in H[/tex] then h is of the form [tex]h=a^n\in H[/tex] for some n in Z. But also [tex]a^{-n}\in H[/tex] since [tex]-n\in Z[/tex]. So we have:

[tex]a^{-n}=(a^n)^{-1}=h^{-1}\in H[/tex], again here i think , that if a would not be an element of the group G, then we wold not be able to perform the following step, that i did on my 'proof' : [tex]a^{-n}=(a^n)^{-1}[/tex] right?




I would appreciate any further and more detailed explanation from you guys. Even if i am pretty close, please try to give me further explanations.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's what I would say:

I don't have my abstract algebra book handy, but if I remember the properties of groups well enough:

i ) looks okay to me.

ii) I would say something like: Since G is a group, if a is in G then a[tex]^{-1}[/tex] is in G. Now a = a[tex]^{1}[/tex] [tex]\in[/tex] H and a[tex]^{-1}[/tex] [tex]\in H[/tex] since 1 and -1 are integers. But a*a[tex]^{-1}[/tex] = a[tex]^{0}[/tex]= e, thus e is in H.

iii) Similarly:

Let h be in H. Then h = a[tex]^{n}[/tex] for some n in Z. Now consider h' = a[tex]^{-n}[/tex], which is in H since -n is in Z.
Now h*h' = a[tex]^{n-n}[/tex] = a[tex]^{0}[/tex] = e. (It's trivially true the other way, h'*h=e). Since h*h' = h'*h = e, h' is the inverse of h.
 
Well, for part (ii) of this problem, here is what my prof said.

Since he said we have to assume that G, is finite, then it means that the elements of G will start to repeat after some time. That is

[tex]a^m=a^n[/tex] for some m,n in Z. then these two el. are also in H. Also there exists [tex](a^n)^{-1}[/tex] so multiplying from the right there we will get:

[tex]a^{m-n}=e\in G[/tex] and also in Z.
 
sutupidmath said:
Well, for part (ii) of this problem, here is what my prof said.

Since he said we have to assume that G, is finite, then it means that the elements of G will start to repeat after some time. That is

[tex]a^m=a^n[/tex] for some m,n in Z. then these two el. are also in H. Also there exists [tex](a^n)^{-1}[/tex] so multiplying from the right there we will get:

[tex]a^{m-n}=e\in G[/tex] and also in Z.

H is a subgroup even if you don't assume G is finite. a^0 is defined as e. And a^(-n) is defined as the inverse of a^n. If you meant n is an element of N (the POSITIVE integers), then you need an additional assumption, and yes, G finite will do it.
 
Well, i guess we needed that extra assumption about G being finite, since we haven't learned subgroups yet, so i guess we couldn't make use of that fact, that H is a subgroup of G.
 
sutupidmath said:
Well, i guess we needed that extra assumption about G being finite, since we haven't learned subgroups yet, so i guess we couldn't make use of that fact, that H is a subgroup of G.

I guess the real question is what did you mean by Z? Is it all integers, or only the positive ones?
 
Dick said:
I guess the real question is what did you mean by Z? Is it all integers, or only the positive ones?

Well, in the book they did not specify it, but i guess they meant all integers.
 
Then you don't need that G is finite. I probably shouldn't have said "subgroup". But the properties you are trying to show imply H is a subgroup of G.
 
How would one prove that if h is in H, then also h^-1, that is its inverse of it is also in H, if Z is only positive integers.

I managed to show, as stated that [tex]e=a^{m-n}\in H[/tex] since i supposed that the group G is finite, and i also know that now i have to take two elements in H, say h and h' and then use the property that H is closed, and

[tex]hh'=...=e\in H[/tex], but i cannot figure out how to pick up h and h'?

Can u help me on this?
 
  • #10


wwwww
 
  • #11
I think i got it, let's see:

SInce [tex]g^{m-n}=e\in H[/tex] it means that H consists of m-n elements, that is all powers of g up to m-n. Now this means that there defenitely are:

[tex]s_1, s_2 \in Z^{+}[/tex] such that [tex]s_1+s_2 =m-n[/tex] while [/tex] g^{s_1},g^{s_2} \in H[/tex] this means that:

For every element in H, say [tex]h=g^{s_2}, s_2 \in Z^+, \exists h'=g^{s_1}, s_1 \in Z^+[/tex] such that

using closure property of H, we get:


[tex]hh'=g^{s_1}g^{s_2}=g^{s_1+s_2}=g^{m-n}=e \in H[/tex] which means that h and h' are inverses of each other, and still both h and h' are in H. Proof done. RIght?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K