AC vs DC: Debunking Myths and Examining Modern Usage

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swiss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ac Dc
AI Thread Summary
Nikola Tesla significantly contributed to the development of alternating current (AC) technology, which has been the dominant power distribution system for over a century due to its efficiency in long-distance transmission. The debate surrounding Tesla's legacy often contrasts his achievements with those of Thomas Edison, with some viewing Tesla as over-romanticized and others as a pivotal figure in electronics. In modern society, AC remains the preferred choice for power distribution, while direct current (DC) is increasingly utilized for long-distance and international connections due to lower losses and lack of synchronism requirements. The discussion acknowledges that while Tesla's innovations were valuable, they have been exaggerated over time, likening him to other notable figures in technology rather than a revolutionary scientist. Overall, AC is favored in power distribution, but DC plays a crucial role in specific applications today.
Swiss
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, All!

This is a thread that should address my questions and evolve into a general discussion on AC and DC for the purpose of interest.

My first question is: What did Nikola Tesla add to the field of electronics and AC? I've read all over the web two conflicting ideas 1) Tesla is God, Edison is the Devil and 2) Tesla added little to an already rich field. To what degree, if any, are either of these two ideas correct?

My second question is: How are AC and DC used in today's modern society and was there a 'winner' to the current wars?

While my knowledge is limited in the field, which shows through the way in which I am asking the questions, answers in full detail would be appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Of course there was a 'winner' for Power distribution. AC has been the system of choice for a hundred years, for good reason. However, for really long distance and international links, DC is used as the losses are less and you don't need synchronism between the systems. It's at least 40:15 in AC's favour.

Tesla was, to my mind, judged correctly by his peers and has been over romanticised by the public later on. What he did was very useful but what he 'talked about doing' has been picked up by his 'followers' and now and is now up amongst all the other Myths of our time, like the Faked Moon landings and the area 51 thing. The Tesla Transformer is such a sexy beast to see that he won the hearts of millions of punters. Good luck to him but he was more like a Clive Sinclair or Alan Sugar, imo, than a Paul Dirac.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top