Accelerating mass: how to compute

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BitWiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerating Mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the final velocity of a mass driver system using energy conservation principles. Chris describes a scenario involving a 10 kg machine that expels a 1 kg mass using 1 joule of energy. The key formulas derived include the kinetic energy equation E = 1/2 Vp (mi - mf) and the final velocity equation V_f = V_i + V_p ln(mi/mf). The calculations confirm that expelling a 1 kg mass results in a velocity of 2 m/s for the expelled mass and a final velocity of 0.222 m/s for the remaining 9 kg mass.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with conservation of momentum
  • Basic knowledge of kinetic energy equations
  • Concept of mass drivers in propulsion systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the rocket equation and its applications
  • Explore advanced concepts in propulsion systems, particularly mass drivers
  • Learn about energy conservation in closed systems
  • Investigate the implications of relativistic effects on mass and energy
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, aerospace engineers, and anyone interested in propulsion technology and energy conservation principles in mechanics.

BitWiz
Gold Member
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Say I have a machine with a mass of 10 kg at rest (with respect to an observer) in frictionless, gravity-free space. This machine now takes 1 kg of itself, and using the energy of 1 joule, flings this 1kg chunk toward the observer. How do I compute the final velocity of the remaining 9kg mass, given that I used a unit of energy as the impetus?

Ignoring Lorentz effects, say a 10 kg machine is in motion at an arbitrary velocity, moving directly away from an independent observer. I fling the 1kg chunk toward the observer using the energy of 1 J. Given that the machine had initial velocity > 0, is the difference in the initial and final velocities the same for the observer as it was when the machine was at rest? How about from the machine's frame looking at the observer in those two situations?

Ultimately, this is what I'm trying to determine: If I have a machine capable of harvesting the energy from a nuclear reactor in space, and I use that energy to accelerate the reactor by accelerating mass in the opposite direction (a mass driver), how do I compute the velocity difference -- from the reactor's frame -- from a quantity of energy? If that is possible, and, if the reactor's power is measured in joules/sec, can I then directly determine the acceleration 1:1? Again, ignoring Lorentz.

Thanks and warm regards,
Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kinetic energy of the mass you fired, computed in frame of the rocket, is equal to the energy expended (assuming 100% efficiency). The rest is conservation of momentum. In the continuous case, you should get rocket formula.

[tex]V_f = V_i + V_p ln\left(\frac{m_i}{m_f}\right)[/tex]

Vp is the velocity with which you are expelling mass, mi is the mass of the rocket with the stuff you are going to expel, and mf is the mass of the rocket after you expelled all that stuff.

Total energy you are going to use up for all of this is just the kinetic energy formula.

[tex]E = \frac{1}{2}V_p(m_i-m_f)[/tex]

So you can figure out how high Vp can be with whatever energy is available.
 
Thanks, K^2. This seems so pleasingly simple. Just to make sure I understand:

[tex]E = \frac{1}{2}V_p(m_i-m_f)[/tex]
then
[tex]V_p = \frac{2E}{m_i-m_f}[/tex]
If the units agree, then if I expel a 1 kg mass from a 10 kg body with 1 joule of energy expended
[tex]V_p = \frac{2}{1}= 2 m/s ?[/tex]
and then the rocket (mf) final velocity is[tex]V_r = V_p\frac{m_i-m_f}{m_f} = \frac{2}{9} m/s?[/tex]

Thanks,
Chris
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K