Acceleration After Applied Force is Stopped?

AI Thread Summary
When a truck accelerates and then the clutch is engaged, the engine's force ceases, leading to a question about the subsequent behavior of acceleration and speed. The initial acceleration may not drop instantaneously to zero; instead, it decreases gradually, allowing the truck to continue gaining speed momentarily. This phenomenon is influenced by the inertia of the vehicle, which can cause it to coast and slightly increase in speed before deceleration begins. The speedometer reflects a smoothed average of speed readings, which can create the illusion of continued acceleration. Understanding these dynamics clarifies why the truck can momentarily climb in speed even after the applied force is removed.
Guy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a question that has been puzzling me for a while.

When I drive my truck and accelerate hard until 25 mph then put the clutch into roll freely, the truck will climb a few more mph before beginning to slow down. This is on flat ground or even a slight uphill.

The way I see it is as follows. Say acceleration of the truck is 5 ft/s2 (random number). Once the clutch is in the force from the engine is now 0, and therefore acceleration should be 0 unless there is another force pushing the truck forward. However in order to be continuous, acceleration cannot jump from 5 to 0, and will have to decrease continuously. While it is decreasing it is still positive and will cause velocity to climb slowly.

Can anyone explain the physics behind this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume that you are watching the speedometer to determine whether you are speeding up or slowing down.

In order to smooth out the readings so that the needle (or the digits) do not vary wildly, the number that is displayed will be some kind of decaying average of the most recent measured values.

As long as your current speed is still higher than the currently displayed average, that average will still be going up.
 
So its is not continuing to accelerate. Thanks for the answer that has bothered me for a while now!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top