Acceleration Due to Gravity in Rocky Mountains

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Scarborm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding an exact measurement of the acceleration due to gravity at a specific location in the Rocky Mountain region. Participants explore various sources and methods for obtaining this data, including online resources and personal measurement techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states the standard value of acceleration due to gravity as 9.81 m/s².
  • Another suggests a USGS source for gravity anomaly data, mentioning that the data may not provide exact measurements but could be useful.
  • A suggestion is made to use a gravimeter from a local university to take personal measurements.
  • One participant questions the concept of a "precise location" on the Earth's surface, implying that sea level might be a more reasonable reference point.
  • Another proposes using an ultra-fine weight scale for personal measurement, although this may require inventiveness to achieve the necessary accuracy.
  • Participants engage in light-hearted banter regarding the usefulness of humor in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on the best method to obtain an exact measurement of gravity, with multiple suggestions and some disagreement on the interpretation of "precise location." The discussion includes both technical suggestions and humorous exchanges, indicating a mix of serious inquiry and light-hearted interaction.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the availability and accuracy of data sources, as well as the challenges involved in personal measurement techniques.

Scarborm
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello All,

Would anyone happen to know where I can find an "exact" measurement of the acceleration due to gravity at a (almost) precise location on the Earth's surface? Anywhere in the Rocky Mountain region would be fine. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a=9.81 m/s^2
 
Scarborm said:
Hello All,

Would anyone happen to know where I can find an "exact" measurement of the acceleration due to gravity at a (almost) precise location on the Earth's surface? Anywhere in the Rocky Mountain region would be fine. Thanks!

In the US,

http://tin.er.usgs.gov/gravity/bouguer/

looks like a good source (if you can get the ftp link to work)

but the data will be gravity anomaly data, there's some discussion of the formulas used in the wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_anomaly

Google gives lots of other hits, too many to mention, some state specific.
 
Oh, just get yourself a simple gravimeter from your local university geology dept. and take your own measurements.

However, if you happen to have a load of liquid He and a lot of free time ( like 24 months just to read the manual), then I suggest you get a top of the line superconducting gravity meter from these guys:he,he :biggrin:
http://www.gwrinstruments.com/GWR_ctspec.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The "precise location of the Earth's surface"?? And where would that be? There's a heckuva lot of "earth's surface" in the region of the Rockies and a lot of people on Earth who would think it would be more reasonable to use the gravitational acceleration at sea leve rather than anywhere near the Rockies!

Edit- sorry, I misunderstood your question.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hows about going there yourself and using an ultra-fine weight scale, and standing on it, move on, do it again. But you might have to "Invent" to find a scale with that kind of accuracy.
 
Thanks Creator and Pervect-- The rest of you are quite useless, but thanks anyway!
 
Useless? humor is useless? somebody 'aughta tell you fella :smile:


:smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:
 
Last edited:
Sorry. My english is not very good. I did not catch the humor, and I did not mean to sound like a jerk.
 
  • #10
Scarborm said:
Sorry. My english is not very good. I did not catch the humor, and I did not mean to sound like a jerk.
You didn't, you aren't and My apologies if I seemed somewhat disconcerted in my attempt at humor.

Not as good at it, sometimes, as I would like to think myself, as being.

:biggrin: :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K