Acceleration of an object to the speed of light.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of accelerating an object to the speed of light, referencing Pauling's definition of matter and radiant energy. It clarifies that, according to current physics, it is impossible to accelerate any object to the speed of light. The conversation emphasizes that if an object were to reach light speed, it would theoretically become radiant energy, but this scenario is purely hypothetical. The participants agree that the laws of physics dictate that anything starting below light speed will remain below it. Ultimately, the definition of matter and radiant energy aligns with the fundamental principles of physics.
Hunus
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I'm reading Pauling's General Chemistry and he starts off his first chapter with, "Matter may be defined as any kind of mass-energy that moves with velocities less that the velocity of light, and radiant energy as any kind of mass-energy that moves with the velocity of light."

I know that we can't accelerate an object to the speed of light, but the wording of this sentence seems to imply that, if we could, it would become radiant energy; as it would then be mass-energy moving with the velocity of light.

So my question is, if we could accelerate an object to the speed of light would it become radiant energy?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hunus said:
...if we could accelerate an object to the speed of light...
The answer is, as you've already admitted, is we can't. (You are, in effect, asking, what would happen if the laws of physics were different? We can't use the laws of physics to answer that.)

That's why the definition makes sense. Anything that starts off slower than light will always be slower than light. Anything that starts off at the speed of light will always be at the speed of light.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Back
Top