Accelerometer to Frequency and Amplitude

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating frequency, average amplitude, and highest amplitude from accelerometer data using Excel. The original poster has already computed displacement in three axes and seeks to understand the underlying math for these calculations. While Excel offers a FREQUENCY function, it primarily serves as a histogram tool rather than a direct method for frequency analysis. Additionally, the "Data Analysis" package in Excel provides statistical summaries, including max, min, and mean, which could be useful. The conversation suggests that creating custom calculations would involve iterating through the data set to sum or count values.
rd42
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have a spreadsheet of Accelerometer data out of an iPhone and I have calculated the displacement in the three axis. I would like to figure out how to take this info and calculate the frequency, avg. amplitude, and the highest amplitude. Excel has a frequency function but I would like to understand that math, so I could make the phone calculate this.

Thank you for any help.

Don't worry, this isn't home work, I'm an old f*rt.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Couldn't open your file with my old Y2K Excel, but I looked at the FREQUENCY function in the help and I think that it is a sort of histogram. I first though it might be an FFT thing, but it looks like it just counts the number of times each specific value or range appears in the input data set.

There was (maybe still a separate package) an Excel "Data Analysis" package that had a statistical summary function. It calculates max, min, mean, median and such for a data set. That package also had a regular histogram where you can bin your data and count how many of each. If you don't know what all those m'words are, have a look at a stat's introduction, probably wiki is a good place to start.

If those functions are what you want, then rolling your own is mostly an exercise in iterating through the set and summing/counting the various values.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top