Acceptance Angle in Optical fibre

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the acceptance angle in optical fibers, specifically addressing the conditions for Total Internal Reflection (TIR). The critical angle, defined by the formula sin(i(c))=n2/n1, serves as a boundary condition where i(c) is the critical angle, n2 is the refractive index of the cladding, and n1 is the refractive index of the core. Participants clarify that TIR occurs at angles greater than the critical angle, emphasizing that the critical angle itself should not be included in the TIR state. The conversation highlights the distinction between mathematical definitions and practical engineering applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Total Internal Reflection (TIR)
  • Knowledge of refractive indices (n1 and n2)
  • Familiarity with critical angle concepts in optics
  • Basic principles of optical fiber design
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the acceptance angle in optical fibers
  • Study the implications of critical angle on light propagation in fibers
  • Explore the differences between closed and open intervals in mathematical contexts
  • Investigate practical applications of TIR in engineering and optical systems
USEFUL FOR

Optical engineers, physics students, and professionals involved in fiber optics design and implementation will benefit from this discussion.

ananth271194
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
According to the derivation of acceptance angle the first step is,
The condition for Total Internal reflection(TIR) is sin(i)≥n2/n1,
where i is angle of incidence in the core,
n2= refractive index of the cladding and n1=refractive index of the core.
sin(i(c))=n2/n1, where i(c) is the critical angle.
For TIR to take place the angle HAS TO BE ONLY GREATER than critical angle.
But the condition above contradicts the statement.
which one is true>
 
Science news on Phys.org
That's a very good point.

IMHO the critical angle is a boundary between two states and should not be included in either state.
Kind of like cutting a piece of paper along a line. Neither piece is part of the cut line.

The contradiction is present even in the text describing the formula and the formula itself here:
light entering the fiber will be guided if it falls within the acceptance cone of the fiber, that is if it makes an angle with the fiber axis that is less than the acceptance angle,

Wikipedia link
 
Last edited:
So basically you assume here that TIR is greater than or equal to critical angle?
 
I think you're letting 'pure maths' get in the way of common sense Engineering here. Engineering doesn't tend to distinguish between what, I seem to remember, are referred to as 'closed intervals' and 'open intervals'.
 
ananth271194 said:
So basically you assume here that TIR is greater than or equal to critical angle?

No,I would state that TIR occurs at angles greater than the critical angle.
For beams incident at critical angle, since no beam can be perfectly parallel, the portion at greater than critical angle is totally reflected. The portion at less than the critical angle is partially refracted. The critical angle is the 0 width boundary between the 2 portions.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K