Active Noise Cancellation / Soundproofing

  • Thread starter Thread starter jonnyb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Noise
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the viability of using active and passive noise cancellation technologies to contain noise within a small area, specifically in the context of headphones. Participants examine whether existing technologies can effectively cancel sounds produced by a noise source, such as a loud frog, within the headphone space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the feasibility of using headphone noise cancellation technology to contain noise from a small source, suggesting that the sound level would be less than 10 dB.
  • Another participant asserts that while electronics for noise cancellation are straightforward, the acoustic challenges are significant due to sound directionality and the complexity of room acoustics.
  • A different scenario is proposed involving a loud frog as the noise source, prompting questions about modifying existing noise cancellation technology to dampen the frog's sound.
  • One participant argues that effectively cancelling the frog's sound within the headphone space is not possible due to causality, as the headphone would react to sound that has already reached the listener.
  • It is suggested that any noise cancellation would need to occur from outside the headphone, and that this process would not be simple due to the unique responses of the sensor, container, and speaker to different frequencies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of cancelling noise from within the headphone space, with some asserting it is not possible while others explore the technical aspects of the challenge. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the practical application of noise cancellation technologies in this specific scenario.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations related to the acoustic properties of the environment and the need for complex signal processing to achieve effective noise cancellation.

jonnyb
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I would be very interested and grateful for guidance on how viable it would be to contain a noise in a relatively small area.
If the aim was to contain a noise through passive and active noise cancellation and the noise source could be contained within a small area, could the technology used in some on ear headphones be used to effectively contain/cancel a noise in a headphone ear piece?
So if a small speaker were to be placed under a headphone earpiece and a sound played ... would the noise cancelling technology in a typical set of headphones be able to help cancel that sound out within the headphone in which the small speaker is so that is not audible outside the headphone?
I am not as knowledgeable on this subject as I would like to be yet and so please forgive me.
I appreciate that the magnitude of the sound being played is relevant but it would be less than 10db.
Kind regards .. Jon
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Electronics wise, it is piece of cake in the sense you mic the noise of the area and invert the signal and play it back out. You will need to do some phase adjustment in the circuit to compensate the mic and speaker characteristic. BUT the difficult part should be the acoustics. Sound can be directional and it has node and anti node depends on where you listen to it. That really get complicated. I worked on some active noise cancellation, but not have to deal with acoustics. You characterize the room, electronics is not bad. That's all I can offer as I don't know anything about acoustic other than set up my hi-fi system.

Ear phone don't have to deal with acoustic because the speaker is by your ears. The electronics should be easy. Your's is much harder. I suggest you look into Acura RL where they have active noise cancellation inside the cabin. Maybe look at some patents.
 
Thanks for the quick reply. I think I need to create a different scenario. Let's say that the noise producer is not a small speaker but a small but quite loud frog that is sitting comfortably inside the speaker headphone which is pushed against a flat surface. (No frogs will be hurt or treated badly in this scenario!) I realized that I don't want to confuse things by having an example where the noise source was electrical and therefore could be part of the circuit. Can the existing active noise cancellation tech that is incorporated in a noise cancelling headphone be modified to help dampen the sound of the noisy frog to the world outside the headphone cup.
 
I think elementing the frog's sound would not be possible because it would defy causality:

If the frog were to start talking, some time would transpire before the walls of the headphone experienced what he had done. Then, if they react, they are doing so to a noise that reached the listner already.

In the case where the frog is outside, his influence can be detected, placed through a signal processor that reacts to generate a signal, with the correct phase and magnitude, to essentially null Mr Frog's message.

The difficulty comes when you realize that the sensor, container, and speaker all have unique reactions to the various frequencies the frog can produce. Thus there is no easy solution to how you sample the noise and create an appropriate response. That's when you introduce a monitor on the listener's side, and a recursive algorithm continually varies aspects of the processing and judges success by how well it reduces the noise. So, Mr Frog may start out to be a nuisance to the untrained system, but it learns how to react over time.
 
That's very interesting. So basically it's not possible to effectively cancel the noise of the frog within the headphone space before the noise reaches the listeners side.
The process would have to be applied from the outside and even then it certianly wouldn't be simple.
A shame .. In my ignorance I thought that the process could be applied within.
Thank you for your advice.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K