Actuarial Exams: Memorization, Theory & Stress Levels

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mag|cK
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of actuarial exams, particularly focusing on the role of memorization versus theoretical understanding, the stress levels associated with the profession, and the work-life balance of actuaries. Participants explore the challenges of studying for these exams and the perceptions of the actuarial profession.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that memorization becomes increasingly important in actuarial exams after the fourth exam, questioning whether mathematics becomes less central as one advances.
  • There is a query about whether memorization in actuarial studies is absolute or can be approached logically, with comparisons made to the memorization required in biology.
  • Concerns are raised about the stress levels associated with being an actuary and whether the salary justifies the demands of the job and the sacrifices made in personal life.
  • One participant shares their experience as an intern actuary, noting that not all firms require a workaholic mentality and that some offer a balanced work environment with good benefits and vacation time.
  • Another participant mentions that while some actuaries may work for large companies with high salaries, the workload can be intense, yet companies often provide time during work hours for exam preparation.
  • There is a discussion about the potential salary progression in the actuarial field, with some participants indicating that significant financial rewards can be achieved over time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of work-life balance in the actuarial profession, with some arguing that it can be balanced while others suggest a more demanding lifestyle. The discussion about the role of memorization versus theory also remains unresolved, with no consensus on whether mathematics fades in importance as one progresses.

Contextual Notes

Participants' experiences and perceptions vary widely, indicating that individual circumstances, such as the size and culture of the firm, can significantly influence the work environment and study demands. There are also unresolved questions regarding the comparison of memorization challenges between actuarial studies and other fields.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals considering a career in actuarial science, current actuarial students, and professionals in related fields may find this discussion relevant.

Mag|cK
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hello. From the internet I have learned that memorization is the main thing in actuarial exams past the fourth exam. The more you advance, the more theoretical the actuarial studies become. Is it true? Does the mathematics slowly fade away the more you advance? For the memorization, is it like "absolute" memorization or you can memorize it logically? For the memorization, is it more challenging than in biology? Will you be still busy after you have reached fellow level? Why is it that actuary is one of the best rated job, when you have to be workaholics including in your studies and abandon your social life? Is the salary worth the cost? Is an actuary stressful? Sorry for the many questions :biggrin: thx... btw can you give your background of career or studies before answering the questions thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You may want to ask your question at the forums here: http://www.actuarialoutpost.com/

Note that (unless things have changed) you will need to sign up from an e-mail address other than the typical yahoo, gmail, msn, etc.
 
i don't have any email besides the ones like hotmail/ yahoo, hence i can't register. Can you post my thread to the actuarial outupost and give me the link. Thx a lot.. :smile:
 
I thought about becoming an actuary for a while and even worked as an intern actuary for around half a year after my undergrad. The job definitely was not for me but I can understand the appeal. You said that being an actuary required you to be a workaholic which is not neccessarily correct. The firm I worked for was small and they seemed much more interested in the easy life than making piles of money. They had only a 4 day/7hr work week and anything that could be considered a holiday was taken on paid leave. Also, in the 6 mo. I was there every employee took at least two weeks of paid vacation off. They received excellent benefits and comfortable salaries.
With that said, you can be a "piles of money" actuary and work for a large company. The work load is greatly increased but it does not require one to be a workaholic. Keep in mind that almost all companies allot part of the workday (1-4 hrs) for non-fellowshiped actuaries to study for the next exam. These exams are nightmarishly tough, but you get paid to study for them, and your salary increases everytime you pass a new one. Companies such as Signa also have executive spiral programs that place actuaries in top positions within the company. In the course of 20 years you can start out at the bottom rung making 30-50k and work to the top with a salary of 250k or more.(Some make vastly more than even this.)
 
What don't you like about the job?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K