Adding Velocities: Newbie Question on Special Relativity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter servo75
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of adding velocities in the context of special relativity, particularly focusing on a scenario involving a spaceship traveling close to the speed of light and the implications for measuring the speed of an object (a baseball) thrown from within the spaceship. Participants explore the effects of relative motion, length contraction, and time dilation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to reconcile the perception of a baseball traveling at 4 ft/s from their own frame of reference while traveling at a speed close to the speed of light.
  • Another participant explains that while the baseball appears to travel at 4 ft/s relative to the thrower, an observer at rest would measure a different speed due to length contraction and time dilation effects.
  • A participant confirms that both the ruler and the spaceship are length-contracted from the bystander's perspective, suggesting that measurements of distance will differ based on the observer's frame of reference.
  • A formula for relativistic velocity addition is provided, indicating how to calculate the observed speed of the baseball from the perspective of an external observer.
  • One participant emphasizes the need for an observer to establish their inertial frame to make accurate measurements, referencing the concept of Einstein synchronization.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the effects of length contraction and time dilation but do not reach a consensus on the implications of these effects for the specific scenario presented. Multiple views on how to interpret the measurements and the necessity of establishing an inertial frame remain evident.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the observers' frames of reference, the definitions of speed, and the application of the relativistic velocity addition formula. The discussion does not resolve these complexities.

servo75
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I'm new to these boards. I have a basic conceptual knowledge of physics, but I was just watching some videos about special relativity and the following question struck me. I'm sure this is probably a pretty simple question but it's really been bothering me...

I understand how "c" is constant and absolute and that it's improper to simply add velocities, but let's take the scenario where I'm on a spaceship traveling at the speed of light minus, say, 1 foot per second. I'm standing still (relative to the ship). I throw a baseball forward at 4 ft/s. Now to a stationary observer you can't add the velocities and say the ball is going faster than light. However in my own frame of reference, I'm at rest, so wouldn't I see the ball traveling away from me at 4 ft/s? How does one resolve this? I figure it has something to do with length contraction of the ball so it's not "really" going at 4 ft/s, but isn't the spaceship length contracted as well? Your thoughts?

Thanks!

Please feel free to be "mathy" in your response.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To you, of course, the ball will seem to travel at 4 ft/s relative to yourself. To someone else standing nearby as you whiz past at just under c, the ball will seem to be barely moving relative to you. This is because of two factors:

* Your ruler is length-contracted in the bystander's frame of reference, so at the point where you claim the ball has moved 4 feet relative to you, the bystander disagrees because to him your ruler is much shorter than it should be.

* Your clock runs slow in the bystander's frame of reference, so at the point when you say one second has elapsed since you released the ball, the bystander says much more time has actually gone by.

If the bystander uses his own ruler and his own clock, he measures a much smaller relative speed than 4 m/s.
 
That makes a lot of sense, thanks! I assume that since my ruler is "contracted" from the bystander's point of view, then the ship itself is contracted as well (since either the ship or the ruler could be used to measure the ball's distance).
 
The formula is this: if you are moving, relative to me, at speed u, and you throw a ball at speed, relative to you, v, then I will observe the ball moving at speed, relative to me, [itex](u+ v)/(1+ uv/c^2)[/itex]
If u and v are both very small reative to c, this will be very close to u+ v. But if either both are close to c, this will be just below c.
 
The_Duck said:
If the bystander uses his own ruler and his own clock, he measures a much smaller relative speed than 4 m/s.

It goes without saying here that a single observer with a ruler and a clock will not be able to come to these conclusions. He will need to establish his inertial frame first which applies to the various locations that the traveler will be moving through, encompassing the various events in this scenario. Such as by this method: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_synchronisation
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K