Adiabatic and Quasistatic Compression

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of adiabatic and quasistatic compression in thermodynamics, focusing on the conditions under which these processes occur, their definitions, and their implications for gas behavior. Participants explore the relationship between the speed of compression and the thermodynamic properties of gases, as well as the application of adiabatic compression in deriving the speed of sound.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the definition of "slow" in the context of quasistatic compression, suggesting it must be slower than the speed of sound in the gas.
  • Another participant argues that quasistatic compression should be much slower than the speed of sound to avoid turbulence and maintain equilibrium throughout the process.
  • There is a discussion about the upper and lower limits for adiabatic compression, with one participant noting that the necessary speed for adiabatic compression is dependent on the heat transfer properties of the enclosure.
  • Concerns are raised about the relationship between the speeds of adiabatic and quasistatic compression, with no guarantee that the minimum adiabatic speed is less than the maximum quasistatic speed.
  • One participant points out that the adiabatic compression formula is often used to derive the speed of sound, suggesting that longitudinal friction must be negligible for volumes smaller than the wavelength of sound.
  • A later reply acknowledges the difference between bulk processes, like moving a piston, and compression waves, indicating that different conditions may apply to each scenario.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and conditions of adiabatic and quasistatic compression, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity regarding the speed limits for both adiabatic and quasistatic processes, as well as the implications of these limits on thermodynamic behavior. There is also mention of the dependence on specific system characteristics, which may not be universally applicable.

Identity
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
In "Introduction to Thermal Physics" - Schroeder, the derivation for adiabatic compression: [tex]V^\gamma P = \mbox{constant}[/tex] is derived by assuming the compression is still slow enough to be quasistatic.

However, I'm still a bit confused with how slow is 'slow'.

Quasistatic compression needs to be slow enough for the gas to respond:
[tex]0< v_{QC} < v_{speed\ of\ sound\ in\ gas}[/tex]

Adiabatic compression requires it to be fast enough for no heat to escape... what are the upper and lower limits for adiabatic compression?

And what happens to the formula for adiabatic compression when we compress faster than quasistatic compression?

Thx
 
Science news on Phys.org
Quastistatic compression should actually be much slower than the speed of sound, slow enough to avoid turbulence. The idea is that the gas is kept in an equilibrium state at all times, so we have a well-defined thermodynamic path from beginning to end.

The necessary speed for adiabatic compression depends upon the heat transfer properties of the enclosure, and is somewhat arbitrary; perhaps you want a <1% or <5% temperature disturbance due to heat transfer during the process.

There's no guarantee that the minimum adiabatic speed is less than the maximum quasistatic speed, but it's normally assumed in introductory thermo classes that such a "happy window" exists.
 
Thanks mapes :)
 
...then you have to explain to me why the adiabatic compression formula is usually used to derive the speed of sound in a gas.
I think the more important restriction (for volumes smaller than the wavelength of sound of a given frequency) is that of the longitudinal friction being negligible. I think all this is well discussed in Landau / Lifshetz Hydrodynamics.
 
DrDu said:
...then you have to explain to me why the adiabatic compression formula is usually used to derive the speed of sound in a gas.
I think the more important restriction (for volumes smaller than the wavelength of sound of a given frequency) is that of the longitudinal friction being negligible. I think all this is well discussed in Landau / Lifshetz Hydrodynamics.

Good point; I was only thinking about one type of system, in which the volume might change via a "bulk" process like a moving piston. In this case, the piston would need to move at much less than the speed of sound to maintain gas equilibrium. But I can see how a compression wave is an entirely different process.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K