Adiabatic Expansion: Constant pressure and temperature

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the principles of adiabatic expansion in thermodynamics, specifically addressing the equation ΔU = q + w. In an adiabatic process, where q = 0, the internal energy change (ΔU) is zero when temperature (T) remains constant, as indicated by the relation T1V1^(1-γ) = T2V2^(1-γ). This implies that if T is constant, then volume (V) does not change, leading to zero work done (W = 0). The participants clarify that for a perfect gas, internal energy (U) is independent of volume, reinforcing that ΔU = CvΔT is valid only when ΔT is zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the first law of thermodynamics (ΔU = q + w)
  • Knowledge of adiabatic processes in thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with the ideal gas law and properties of perfect gases
  • Basic calculus for interpreting work done (W = -∫pdV)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between temperature and volume in adiabatic processes using the equation T1V1^(1-γ) = T2V2^(1-γ)
  • Explore the implications of internal energy being independent of volume for perfect gases
  • Learn about the specific heat capacities (Cv and Cp) and their roles in thermodynamic equations
  • Investigate the concept of work done in various thermodynamic processes, including isothermal and isochoric processes
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students of physical chemistry, thermodynamics enthusiasts, and educators seeking to clarify the principles of adiabatic expansion and internal energy changes in ideal gases.

Hpatps1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm new to the forum, so please be kind.

I was reading through my pchem textbook, and I noticed something. We're given the equation:

ΔU = q + w

For an adiabatic expansion, we're told that q = 0. Fair enough, no heat transfer. But when there is a constant T and change in V, my book says:

ΔU = 0 (U is constant)

I don't understand. W = -∫pdV, doesn't it? Why is work zero?
The book also says that for a perfect gas, U isn't dependent on volume. When they use this fact, it makes sense why ΔU = 0, but it seems like a contradiction when using the definition of work.

Also, the book continues and says:

ΔU = CvΔT when V is constant.

Again, W = -∫pdV, right? So dV = 0, shouldn't ΔU = 0?

Thanks in advance!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hi Hpatps1,
For the adiabatic expansion we have the relation between T and V as T1V11-\gamma=T2V21-\gamma.
Where T1,V1 and T2,V2 are data of the system at two different states. If T is constant then T1=T2. Then by the above equation V1=V2. Hence dV is zero, and the W. That's why ΔU is zero.
Now for the next. By the above data it is clear that dV is zero iff T is constant (ΔT=0). So in the equation ΔU=CvΔT, ΔU certainly becomes zero when ΔT=0.
Regards.
 
Thanks! That makes sense.
 
As a gas expands or contracts adiabatically, although q=0, the temperature changes as a result of the particles doing work on the surroundings, so there is a change in internal energy equal to the work done by or to the system. U is only dependent on the kinetic energies of the molecules of the gas in an ideal system.
 
Hpatps1 said:
I'm new to the forum, so please be kind.

I was reading through my pchem textbook, and I noticed something. We're given the equation:

ΔU = q + w

For an adiabatic expansion, we're told that q = 0. Fair enough, no heat transfer. But when there is a constant T and change in V, my book says:

ΔU = 0 (U is constant)

I don't understand. W = -∫pdV, doesn't it? Why is work zero?
I am not sure why you say W = 0. Why do you think W = 0?

The book also says that for a perfect gas, U isn't dependent on volume. When they use this fact, it makes sense why ΔU = 0, but it seems like a contradiction when using the definition of work.

Also, the book continues and says:

ΔU = CvΔT when V is constant.

Again, W = -∫pdV, right? So dV = 0, shouldn't ΔU = 0?
Why would ΔU = 0?

AM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K