Aerospace Engineering: Lift Mass 1ft-1.5ft Off Ground

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of building a device similar to a helicopter that can lift approximately 75 lbs using a fan system. Participants explore the necessary specifications for the fan diameter, RPM, torque requirements for an electric motor, and the overall design considerations for achieving the desired lift height of 1 to 1.5 feet off the ground.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to learn about the physics and engineering required to lift 75 lbs with a fan system, specifying a preference for a 2 ft diameter fan.
  • Another participant warns that lifting 75 lbs with a 2 ft diameter fan is not feasible and raises safety concerns regarding the potential dangers of such a project.
  • Some participants suggest that the required torque and RPM of the motor are more critical than the RPM alone, emphasizing the importance of rotor assembly weight and balance.
  • Concerns are raised about the structural integrity of a fan operating at high RPMs, including potential failures of bearings and the fan itself under load.
  • Participants discuss the airflow requirements and the implications of restricting airflow, with one arguing that it would hinder performance rather than help.
  • One participant references a specific example of thrust generated by a larger propeller at lower RPMs, suggesting that the OP should consider different configurations.
  • There are discussions about the costs and complexities associated with using turbine engines, with some participants cautioning against the OP's lack of technical background for such systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the feasibility of the OP's project, with many asserting that lifting 75 lbs with the specified parameters is unrealistic. There is no consensus on a viable approach, and multiple competing views on the requirements and safety considerations remain.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the OP's understanding of the physics involved, the need for safety precautions, and the technical specifications required for successful lift. There are unresolved mathematical and engineering considerations regarding torque, RPM, and thrust generation.

Eskimo87
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, i don't really know anything about physics and engineering... i wish to learn alittle... but i am building something and i don't know what i need... its more like a helicopter to lift close to 75lbs. i would like to use a 4blade or 5blade fan system but do not know the measurments i need them to be to be able to lift 75lbs. i need to also know how fast the fan needs to spin RPMs and the diameter of the fan and how much torque i need for an ELECTRIC motor to lift 75lbs i would like to use no bigger than a 2ft diameter fan.

I NEED TO LIFT THE MASS 1ft TO 1.5ft OFF THE GROUND
please can you help me?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm sorry, that isn't going to work. You have no idea what it would require to lift 75lbs. The helicopter could kill a person. Please do not even think of attempting this.
 
appearently you didnt read my post...


can someone help me? << insult deleted by berkeman >>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Eskimo, that was an unnecessarily rude response to a legitimate answer. There's no damned way in the world that you're going to lift 75 lbs. with a 2' diameter fan. Also, helicopters use rotors, not fans. How on Earth do you think that you could control the cyclic and collective on a fan? You should listen to advice given by someone like Cyrus who knows what he's talking about.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Eskimo87 said:
appearently you didnt read my post...


can someone help me? << insult deleted by berkeman >>

Eskimo, Personal insults are not allowed here on the PF. Cyrus and now Danger are pointing out that your initial proposal is not feasible. Perhaps you should ask what would be needed in general to perform the lift you want. And you should let us know what safeguards you will use to be sure to not get hurt in building and testing your device.
 
ok sorry bout the insult...im just sick of people won't work... i said i want a 2' diameter don't mean i can't get bigger... tellin i need to go up and down no other directions... it is not a helicopter i said it is LIKE a helicopter... i got a 10000rpm electric motor... think that might help me? and what voltage do i need to get it fo max preform?

look i know this is possible... i just need to pretty much know how big of an electric motor(torgue/rpm) and how small i can go on diameter of lift blades... i can take care of acceleration with a power control switch/remote... I am just in a hurry to get this done... don't mean to be insulting... sorry

please help me
 
Last edited:
Apology accepted on my part; it's up to Cyrus whether or not he concurs.
The rpm of the motor is irrelevant in this situation. Your available torque is what matters. That in turn has to be factored in with how much your rotor assembly weighs and how it's balanced. As a rough guess, I say that you need at least a 2 metre diameter rotor set to lift 75 lbs., considering that you also have to lift the mass of the machine itself. An even rougher guess is that you would need somewhere around 2-3 hp, which you are not going to get from your electric motor. I admit that these are just intuitive figures, but others here can do the math and figure out the reality. Hang on for them to respond.
 
Whoa. Someone does have a deathwish. That's OK though. I doubt you'll get far enough to cause any real damage.

You're sure that this will work? Let's look at some very basic reasons why it won't:

1) At 10,000 rpm, a 2ft diameter fan would have a tip speed of 1047 ft/s. That's M=.94.
A regular industriual fan will work like crap at those tip speeds.

2) An industrial fan at those speeds will most certainly be overstressed at the hub. Structurally the fan will not survive.

3) Even if you could get it to structurally survive, the bearing and structure are not designed to go at those speeds. To produce 75 pounds of thrust (if you were 100% efficient) the bearings would have to be able to support that 75 pound thrust load. You'll probably toast those cheap Chinese bearings with that load and at that speed.

4) For argument's sake, since I don't know what fan you have, let's look at the airflow requirements for a 2 ft diameter fan to produce 75 pounds of thrust:
- If you assume an exit velocity of 50 ft/s (M=.45), you would have to produce a mass flow rate of 4.8 Lbm/sec. That is HUGE for a fan.

- If you assume a reasonable mass flow rate of 1 Lbm/sec (still pretty friggin big), that equates to an exit velocity of 2415 ft/sec (M=2.2)

I think this is a pretty good start. This doesn't even begin to talk about what Danger mentioned
in regards to controlling the thing.
 
ok i got another qed out of a question... if the airflow is forced out of a smaller hole the pressure will be stronger... will that help me out? can it carry 50 lbs?
 
  • #10
Eskimo87 said:
ok i got another qed out of a question... if the airflow is forced out of a smaller hole the pressure will be stronger... will that help me out? can it carry 50 lbs?

Ugh, no eskimo...no. You will not Carry 75lbs. Not 50lbs, not even 10lbs. I would google the lifting capaibilities of an RC helicopter to get an idea of what you are trying to accomplish here. You are in fantasy land.
 
  • #11
Eskimo87 said:
ok i got another qed out of a question... if the airflow is forced out of a smaller hole the pressure will be stronger... will that help me out? can it carry 50 lbs?
A fan has a certain performance range and restricting it's flow will hurt, not help. Google "fan curve" and check some out...
 
  • #12
All depends on torque, rpm, and prop type,

on http://www.jetcatusa.com/spt5.html it's specs are

Thrust: 55 lbs with 27" prop at 7,000 RPM

Though this is using 27" prop, also I would research more on this subject.

If you ask questions in a logical a manner, and check your grammar (so that it doesn't feel like it's coming from a teenager) I'm sure you will get better answers to your questions in the future.

"im just in a hurry to get this done" is a red flag, beware accidents usually happen when your in a hurry. BTW people have died with props at this size going that fast, to things like someone else mentioned earlier "bearing failing" i.e. your motor might work at those speed, but can it handle the pull/push on the motor rotor?
 
  • #13
Jesus christ, do you have any idea how much that turoprop motor costs? You're easily talking in the 4-5 thousand dollar range.

That is one serioussss turbine you linked to. I'm not too sure about turbines because I don't fly them, but I know you need special permits and training. You can't just buy one, slap it into an airframe and fly around with one. That thing could very easily kill you, or someone standing next to you.
 
  • #14
Cyrus said:
Jesus christ, do you have any idea how much that turoprop motor costs? You're easily talking in the 4-5 thousand dollar range.

That is one serioussss turbine you linked to. I'm not too sure about turbines because I don't fly them, but I know you need special permits and training. You can't just buy one, slap it into an airframe and fly around with one. That thing could very easily kill you, or someone standing next to you.
No need to curse.

Example I linked, just demonstrates that many pounds (>40lb) of thrust can be generated with an smaller prop 27" and under 10k rpm with the proper torque, as that was my only point.

btw the permits you talk about are at --> http://www.modelaircraft.org/documents.aspx and look under 'Turbine' section, it's really doesn't appear to be that special about it.
 
  • #15
That's way outside what the OP was talking about. He was asking about an electric motor being the prime mover. Besides, I doubt the OP has the technical background for running a turboprop. I am assuming they had one too many zeros in the final prop rpms.

One does need to be turbine rated if you get a license, but if you throw the experimental tag on the aircraft, I'm pretty sure it is wide open.
 
  • #16
spaceball3000 said:
No need to curse.

Example I linked, just demonstrates that many pounds (>40lb) of thrust can be generated with an smaller prop 27" and under 10k rpm with the proper torque, as that was my only point.

btw the permits you talk about are at --> http://www.modelaircraft.org/documents.aspx and look under 'Turbine' section, it's really doesn't appear to be that special about it.

Curse? :confused:
 
  • #17
Omg, I want one! I don't know why, I just do. Too friggin cool.
 
  • #18
Cyrus said:
Curse? :confused:
My apologies, you didn't curse, just the words were used in a manner that I thought it was a curse.
 
  • #19
FredGarvin said:
That's way outside what the OP was talking about. He was asking about an electric motor being the prime mover. Besides, I doubt the OP has the technical background for running a turboprop. I am assuming they had one too many zeros in the final prop rpms.

One does need to be turbine rated if you get a license, but if you throw the experimental tag on the aircraft, I'm pretty sure it is wide open.
I do not think it was outside the OP question,

Eskimo87 said:
...
"how fast the fan needs to spin RPMs and the diameter of the fan and how much torque i need for an ELECTRIC motor to lift 75lbs i would like to use no bigger than a 2ft diameter fan."

The link I provided shows acuall data with thrust of 55 lbs with 27" prop at 7,000 RPM, which is relevant to the question above, as it shows feasibility.

BTW I'm not suggesting he buy a turboprop, or turbine engine.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K