Aerospace engineering non-conventional applications

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the non-conventional applications of aerospace engineering, specifically exploring fields outside traditional aerospace roles such as aircraft and satellite design. Participants share insights on potential career paths in areas like automotive aerodynamics and embedded systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that aerospace engineers can work in fields like car aerodynamics and wind turbine aerodynamics due to overlapping concepts with mechanical engineering.
  • There is a question about the applicability of avionics knowledge in embedded systems outside of aircraft, with some uncertainty about the hiring preferences of industries.
  • One participant notes that the transition between engineering disciplines may depend on individual experience and education level, particularly at the graduate level.
  • It is mentioned that the automotive industry does hire aerospace engineers, especially for roles related to airflow, which is similar to aerodynamics in aviation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that aerospace engineers possess relevant skills applicable to other fields, but there is uncertainty regarding the extent to which they are hired in non-aerospace roles. The discussion reflects multiple viewpoints on the hiring practices and the relevance of aerospace training in other industries.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the variability in individual experiences and the lack of consensus on industry hiring trends, which may depend on specific skills and educational background.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in aerospace engineering career paths, students exploring interdisciplinary applications, and professionals considering transitions into non-traditional engineering roles may find this discussion relevant.

rfranceschetti
Messages
29
Reaction score
2
Hello guys,

I'd like to know what non-conventional areas (i.e., not related to the airspace, aircrafts, satellites, etc) an aerospace engineer could work in. I've read somewhere that some aerospace engineers work with high-performance cars aerodynamics. Do you guys know something similar?

Thanks.

P.S.: I wasn't sure if I should post this in the General Engineering section or in the MechE section. I chose the former since AerospaceE doesn't comprehend only mechanical aspects.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aerospace engineers learn a lot of the same (in fact, nearly all of the same) concepts as mechanical engineers, so it's likely that most fields containing mechanical engineers will have at least some aerospace engineers working in the same field. Car aerodynamics and wind turbine aerodynamics would be two big areas where you will find a lot of aerospace engineers. I know quite a few that went to work for oil companies as well. Any field that would require control systems is a popular one, such as robotics.
 
Aerospace engineers also learn a lot of avionics. Do you think these professionals have sufficient knowledge to work with embedded systems in equipments other than aircrafts?

Thanks for your reply!
 
Sure.
 
Thanks, nice to hear. But practically speaking, they do indeed get hired to do this kind of work? Or it's an exception? Because I have the feeling that the industry would prefere to hire electrical engineers to do the electronics, and MechE to do the mechanical part.
 
It really depends on what sort of experience each person has. If your background is a BS in the subject, then it will likely be harder to jump across "engineering lines" because your set of experiences is going to be more general to your undergraduate degree. Once you start getting to the graduate level, your experience is going to be more specific to certain types of controls or fluids or materials or whatever else, and then you will be more competitive for jobs that are looking for people to come apply those sets of skills, regardless of the final product being designed.

Also, the automotive industry, for example, hires a lot of aerospace engineers with just a BS. The air flow over a car, for example, is so similar to that of a plane that the training in a typical aerospace program is very relevant. In other words, my above paragraph is not a universal rule, just a rough (over)generalization.
 
I understand. I read in other posts that you're an aerospace engineer yourself. Could you please tell me a bit of your experience in the industry, the projects you've worked with, in what did you specialize, etc, if that's not too much work? Would you do it again?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
27K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K