Aether Experiments: What's Your Take?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two experiments related to aether theories, which are critiqued for their lack of clarity and scientific rigor. Participants note that the experiments aim to assess the properties of aether rather than its existence, with a consensus that modern physics views light as a wave in the electromagnetic field, not a material substance. Concerns are raised about the validity of the experiments, particularly the use of a mercury barometer to create a vacuum that supposedly excludes aether, which is seen as a misunderstanding of aether's nature. The thread concludes with a recommendation to consult established literature on aether theories, and it is locked due to the absence of published references for the experiments. Overall, the experiments are deemed inadequate for rejecting aether theories.
user1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What are your opinions about these two experiments described at: http://adsind.wordpress.com? Can they be used to reject some of the aether theories?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a published reference? (A personal website is not an acceptable reference.)
 
No. The experiments are posted only on that website. I was interested to know what people on these forums think about the experiments.
 
I get the impression that the person who wrote that is not even clear what the question is. Both of those experiments seem to be aimed at determining, not whether the "aether" exists but whether it has properties, such as pressure, etc. of material "objects". It seems to me that most, if not all, physicists today accept that "light" is a wave in the electro-magnetic field so that the "either", not any material substance.
 
"The cavity created inside the piston system should be free of aether since we assumed that aether does not pass through high density metals. We assume that the entire system is perfectly built and sealed so that there is no gap between exterior of the cube and the inside cavity. The cavity can be better sealed from the exterior if we submerse the entire piston system into mercury."

The author uses a mercury barometer to create a "vacuum" which excludes the aether ... because the aether cannot pass through heavy metals.

No, I don't think that this would accomplish any of the stated goals. Most of the "writing" is simply a detailed description of how to build a not-so-good vacuum chamber. The author seems to view the "aether" as a liquid or gas which can be excluded from here, or captured there ...

I suggest you read this instead: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_theories
 
That should answer your question. I am locking this thread because there is not a published reference for this experiment.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top