Air Check Valve: Preventing Air Pressure Backup in Lift Fans

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of an air check valve in lift fans for hovercraft, exploring its potential benefits and drawbacks in preventing air pressure backup. Participants also consider alternative motor options and efficiency improvements related to lift systems, including power requirements and design considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether an air check valve would effectively prevent air pressure backup through the lift fan, suggesting that a continuous smooth flow is necessary for efficiency.
  • There are concerns that a one-way valve could restrict flow and increase weight, potentially leading to higher fuel usage.
  • Participants discuss the importance of minimizing skirt-to-ground losses to improve lift efficiency, suggesting that closer tolerances in fan and ducting could help.
  • Some propose using an outrunner motor for lift, noting its lightweight and power output, while also considering the need for an onboard generator.
  • One participant emphasizes the inefficiency of using an internal combustion engine to power a generator for an electric motor, advocating for direct drive solutions instead.
  • There is mention of the potential advantages of high bypass gas turbine engines for larger hovercraft due to their continuous power requirements.
  • Concerns are raised about the weight of batteries in electric lift systems, with suggestions that solar panels could mitigate some of these issues.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and effectiveness of an air check valve, with no consensus reached on its utility. There are also competing perspectives on the best power source for lift systems, including internal combustion engines versus electric motors.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence on skirt-to-ground loss estimates for evaluating lift system designs, indicating that this is a critical but unresolved aspect of the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in hovercraft design, lift fan efficiency, and alternative propulsion systems may find this discussion relevant.

Piper84
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
would an air check valve help lift by preventing air presure backup through the lift fan?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What do you think ? Try doing a sketch of the air flow system in a simple hovercraft .
 
It may not require as much hp if a ck valve is used our a large poppit type valve?
 
Piper84 said:
would an air check valve help lift by preventing air presure backup through the lift fan?
The lift fan is a compressor that generates a downward flow and so should have no back flow. I would expect a continuous smooth flow of air would be necessary to maintain the continuous flow that is lost from below the skirt. Any stop-start flow condition would stall and greatly disrupt the flow through the compressor, it would lead to a total loss of compressor efficiency.

A one way valve would need to stay open. It would reduce the flow by the restriction or by the return spring pressure. It appears that, not only is a non-return valve not needed but it would increase the weight and reduce the flow, both of which would increase fuel usage.
 
Thank you for the info. Should have realized that the whole craft is like a ck valve holding air presure in and released at a controlled rate by the skert. Trying to think of ways to use less hp. Closer tolerance in fan and ducting may help.
 
Piper84 said:
Closer tolerance in fan and ducting may help.

It's losses between skirt and ground that matter most. If you could reduce that to zero you would only have to pump up the skirt once.
 
Any one think of using an outrunner motor? Thay are light wt. and the one I'm looking at can put out 25 hp but requires 150 to 200 amps at 70 v max ECS control mod. This may be a good lift/thrust motor. Would need an onboard generator for power. I have used micro wave transformers rewound as a step down transformer For other projects may try it for this application. Any input?
 
Piper84 said:
Any one think of using an outrunner motor? Thay are light wt. and the one I'm looking at can put out 25 hp but requires 150 to 200 amps at 70 v max ECS control mod. This may be a good lift/thrust motor. Would need an onboard generator for power. I have used micro wave transformers rewound as a step down transformer For other projects may try it for this application. Any input?

Did I miss it; how much weight are you trying to lift?

As @CWatters said, the key parameter is the skirt-to-ground losses. Without that estimate, you can't estimate the size of anything else.
 
Total wt. of craft with two people will be around 600 lbs using a 12 x 5 ft. Deck
 
  • #10
Piper84 said:
This may be a good lift/thrust motor. Would need an onboard generator for power. I have used micro wave transformers rewound as a step down transformer For other projects may try it for this application. Any input?
Any electrical lift system should avoid transformers and low frequency power. It needs to use aircraft technology = 400Hz three phase alternators and switching power controls. Why have an internal combustion engine plus an alternator and a motor when the ICE could do the job without the added mass and inefficiency of the electrical components?

As a hovercraft increases in size the skirt length rises in proportion to the diameter while the area rises as to the square of the diameter. Load capacity rises with area. PV panels become a better investment as size increases.

Since power requirements are continuous it would seem that a high bypass gas turbine engine would be a good lift solution as it could operate at an optimum setting. For smaller craft, a tuned two stroke diesel might also be considered in that application. Batteries are still heavy so there seems little advantage in electric motors for lift air compressor, unless the craft is fitted with efficient solar panels. Unlike some high altitude UAV aircraft, hovercraft do not always operate in clear sunlight, there are shadows.
 
  • #11
+1

I don't see any advantage of using an internal combustion engine to power a generator that powers an electric motor. Just use the internal combustion engine to drive the lift fan direct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K